One in three or three in one: Integrating three competing theoretical models (TPB, VIP, and PADM) to explain the intentions to act/actions against climate change
- PMID: 39553624
- PMCID: PMC11565018
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39337
One in three or three in one: Integrating three competing theoretical models (TPB, VIP, and PADM) to explain the intentions to act/actions against climate change
Abstract
This study examines multidimensional factors affecting climate change response behavior. It constructs an integrated model based on the theory of planned behavior, value-identity-personal norms model, and protective action decision model, as a single theory cannot capture the complex nature of human behavior. Recent studies have shown that integrating theories include various influencing factors and indicate higher explanatory power. Therefore, this study uses an integrated model to identify multidimensional influencing factors. The fit of the integrated model was confirmed to be excellent (Chi-square = 1271.866, p = .000, GFI = 0.930, NFI = 0.940, RMSEA = 0.060, TLI = 0.937, SRMR = 0.059), and identity exhibited the greatest effect on personal norms, followed by intention on behavior. The integrated model suggests the following path: ecological value → identity → personal norms → stakeholder awareness → intention → behavior and then ecological value → identity → perceived behavioral control → risk awareness → intention → behavior. The results of the integrated model suggest that a multifaceted approach is necessary to promote climate change response behavior. Various factors, such as ecological value, identity, personal norms, stakeholder awareness, perceived behavioral control, and risk awareness, interact and influence behavior. Policies and programs that comprehensively consider these factors should be established.
Keywords: Climate change awareness; Protective action decision model; Response to climate change; Theory of planned behavior; Value–identity–personal norms model.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Self-Identity Matters: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Decode Tourists' Waste Sorting Intentions.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065099. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36982009 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of factors influencing family farms' adoption of green prevention and control techniques on an integrative framework of the TPB and NAM.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jul;247:104314. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104314. Epub 2024 May 18. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024. PMID: 38761754
-
Predicting Australian adults' sun-safe behaviour: examining the role of personal and social norms.Br J Health Psychol. 2015 May;20(2):396-412. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12108. Epub 2014 Jun 11. Br J Health Psychol. 2015. PMID: 24917299
-
Understanding aberrant driving intentions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: Literature review and Meta-Analysis.J Safety Res. 2024 Sep;90:225-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 31. J Safety Res. 2024. PMID: 39251282 Review.
-
Predicting Vaccination Intention against COVID-19 Using Theory of Planned Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;10(12):2026. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122026. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36560436 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- WHO . 2022. State of the Global Climate in 2021 Report.
-
- Gifford R.D., Chen A.K. Why aren't we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change. 2017;140:165–178.
-
- Van de Ven D.J., González-Eguino M., Arto I. The potential of behavioural change for climate change mitigation: a case study for the European Union. Mitig. Adapt. Strategies Glob. Change. 2018;23:853–886.
-
- Clark C.F., Kotchen M.J., Moore M.R. Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: participation in a green electricity program. Journal of environmental psychology. 2003;23(3):237–246.
-
- Smith E.K., Mayer A. A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries. Global Environ. Change. 2018;49:140–153.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources