Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):4424-4435.
doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4424.

Endoscopic and pathological features of neoplastic transformation of gastric hyperplastic polyps: Retrospective study of 4010 cases

Affiliations

Endoscopic and pathological features of neoplastic transformation of gastric hyperplastic polyps: Retrospective study of 4010 cases

Dong-Xue Zhang et al. World J Gastrointest Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Hyperplastic polyps, which represent 30%-93% of all gastric epithelial polyps, are the second most common type of gastric polyps after fundic gland polyps. They were previously considered to have no risk of neoplastic transformation. Recently, an increasing number of cases of gastric hyperplastic polyps (GHPs) combined with neoplastic changes have been reported; however, the specific mechanism underlying their transformation has not been thoroughly explored.

Aim: To investigate the clinical, endoscopic, and pathological characteristics of the neoplastic transformation of GHPs and explore the risk factors.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 4010 cases of GHPs diagnosed by gastroscopy and pathological examination at the hospital from 2005 to 2021. In total, 3874, 119, and 17 cases were in the group without intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), with low-grade IN, and with high-grade IN, respectively. The data analysis examined the association of endoscopic and pathological features with risk factors for neoplastic transformation. Factors with significant differences were entered into univariate logistic regression, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Univariate analysis revealed diameter, multiple polyp presence, redness, rough surface, lobulation, erosion, Yamada classification, location, and gastric mucosa were risk factors for neoplastic transformation. Multivariate analysis showed that age > 65 years [odds ratio (OR) = 1.789; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.227-2.609; P = 0.003], male sex (OR = 1.680; 95%CI: 1.158-2.438; P = 0.006), multiple polyps (OR = 1.851; 95%CI: 1.230-2.784; P = 0.003), pedunculated or semi-pedunculated shape (OR = 2.722; 95%CI: 1.689-4.388; P < 0.001), and polyp diameter were significantly associated with GHPs that demonstrated neoplastic transformation. Compared with chronic superficial gastritis, autoimmune gastritis, atrophic gastritis, and gastritis with IN were independent risk factors for neoplastic transformation [(OR = 2.672; 95%CI: 1.559-4.579; P < 0.001), (OR = 1.876; 95%CI: 1.134-3.103; P = 0.014), and (OR = 5.299; 95%CI: 3.173-8.849; P < 0.001), respectively].

Conclusion: Male sex, age > 65 years, multiple polyps, pedunculated or semi-pedunculated shape, polyp size > 1 cm, and specific background gastric mucosa are key indicators for predicting neoplastic transformation of GHPs.

Keywords: Endoscopy; Gastric hyperplastic polyps; Neoplastic transformation; Pathology; Risk factors; Tumour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of date collection. GHPs: Gastric hyperplastic polyps; IN: Intraepithelial neoplasia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endoscopic and pathological features of gastric hyperplastic polyps. A: Gastric hyperplastic polyp, smooth surface, same color as surrounding mucosa; B: Pathological manifestation of gastric hyperplastic polyps (Hematoxylin-eosin staining); C: Gastric hyperplastic polyp with carcinomatous transformation, with multiple pedunculated/sub-pedunculated shape, measuring > 3 cm in diameter, rough and red surface; D and E: The pathology of gastric hyperplastic polyp with carcinomatous transformation (Hematoxylin-eosin staining); F: Ki-67 positive of the lesion (immunohistochemical staining).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of risks for neoplastic transformation of gastric hyperplastic polyps. OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

References

    1. Kővári B, Kim BH, Lauwers GY. The pathology of gastric and duodenal polyps: current concepts. Histopathology. 2021;78:106–124. - PubMed
    1. Salomao M, Luna AM, Sepulveda JL, Sepulveda AR. Mutational analysis by next generation sequencing of gastric type dysplasia occurring in hyperplastic polyps of the stomach: Mutations in gastric hyperplastic polyps. Exp Mol Pathol. 2015;99:468–473. - PubMed
    1. Han AR, Sung CO, Kim KM, Park CK, Min BH, Lee JH, Kim JY, Chang DK, Kim YH, Rhee PL, Rhee JC, Kim JJ. The clinicopathological features of gastric hyperplastic polyps with neoplastic transformations: a suggestion of indication for endoscopic polypectomy. Gut Liver. 2009;3:271–275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markowski AR, Markowska A, Guzinska-Ustymowicz K. Pathophysiological and clinical aspects of gastric hyperplastic polyps. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:8883–8891. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu H, Zhang Q, Chen G, Pritchard DM, Zhang S. Risk factors and clinical correlates of neoplastic transformation in gastric hyperplastic polyps in Chinese patients. Sci Rep. 2020;10:2582. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources