Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 28;32(1):83-89.
doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2024.23007.

Evaluation of Effective Factors on Decision of Families Regarding Medical Abortion Recommended due to Fetal Anomaly

Gülay Ekinci  1 , Sevil İnal  2
Affiliations

Evaluation of Effective Factors on Decision of Families Regarding Medical Abortion Recommended due to Fetal Anomaly

Gülay Ekinci et al. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. .

Abstract

The study aims to examine the effective factors influencing the decision of families to whom medical abortion was recommended due to fetal anomalies. The cross-sectional study was conducted at İstanbul University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, High-Risk Pregnancies and Maternity Ward. The sample consisted of 233 pregnant women, to whom medical abortion was recommended due to the diagnosis of foetal anomaly collected inover a 1-year period. While 122 of the families decided to have medical abortions, 111 decided to give birth. The rate of deciding on medical abortion was the highest in families whose fetuses had a high expectation rate of lethal anomalies (p < .001). The most effective factor for the families who decided to give birth was their religious beliefs. The most effective factor for the families who decided to have a medical abortion was the information they received from health professionals. While the religious beliefs of the parents were effective in the decision to give birth, the information they received from the health professionals was effective in the decision to have a medical abortion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Ahmed S., Ahmed M., Sharif S. M., Sheridan E., & Taylor G. R. (2012). Attitudes towards prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in British Pakistani parents and relatives of children with recessive conditions in the UK. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32(10), 954–959. (10.1002/pd.3940) - DOI - PubMed
    1. AlAlaiyan S. (2014). An Islamic legal perspective on the status of the malformed fetus and the previable infant. Journal of Palliative Care and Medicine, 4(2), 4,172(10.4172/2165-7386.1000174) - DOI
    1. Allen K. A. (2014). Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: An integrated literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(9), 1289–1304. (10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.003) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alshalan M., & Alfadhel M. (2020). Attitudes to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormalities in Saudi couples: A single center experience. Journal of Biochemical and Clinical Genetics, 2(2), 99–99. (10.24911/JBCGenetics/183-1574152719) - DOI
    1. Aslan H., Yildirim G., Ongut C., & Ceylan Y. (2007). Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 99(3), 221–224. (10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.047) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources