Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan;22(1):28-45.
doi: 10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm

Affiliations
Review

Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm

Paolo Ciracì et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Over the past few years, several novel systemic treatments have emerged for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, thus making selection of the most effective later-line therapy a challenge for medical oncologists. Over the past decade, regorafenib and trifluridine-tipiracil were the only available drugs and often provided limited clinical benefit compared to best supportive care. Results from subsequent practice-changing trials opened several novel therapeutic avenues, both for unselected patients (such as trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab or fruquintinib) and for subgroups defined by the presence of actionable alterations in their tumours (such as HER2-targeted therapies or KRASG12C inhibitors) or with no acquired mechanisms of resistance to the previously received targeted agents in circulating tumour DNA (such as retreatment with anti-EGFR antibodies). In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of advances in the field over the past few years and offer a practical perspective on translation of the most relevant results into the daily management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using an evidence-based algorithm. Finally, we discuss some of the most appealing ongoing areas of research and highlight approaches with the potential to further expand the therapeutic armamentarium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: C.C. has acted as an adviser and/or consultant of AstraZeneca, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Takeda and Tempus; declares speaker’s fees from Amgen, Bayer, MSD, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier and Takeda; and has received research grants from Amgen, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seagen (Pfizer), Servier, Tempus. C.A. has acted as a consultant and/or adviser of Takeda and has received speaker’s fees from Merck. The other authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Siegel, R. L., Giaquinto, A. N. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74, 12–49 (2024). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay, J. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur. J. Cancer 103, 356–387 (2018). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Shiu, K.-K. et al. LBA32 Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): 5-year follow-up of the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-177 study. Ann. Oncol. 34, S1271–S1272 (2023). - DOI
    1. Watanabe, J. et al. Panitumumab vs bevacizumab added to standard first-line chemotherapy and overall survival among patients with RAS wild-type, left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 329, 1271–1282 (2023). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Cremolini, C. et al. Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 21, 497–507 (2020). - PubMed - DOI