Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm
- PMID: 39558030
- DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00965-0
Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm
Abstract
Over the past few years, several novel systemic treatments have emerged for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, thus making selection of the most effective later-line therapy a challenge for medical oncologists. Over the past decade, regorafenib and trifluridine-tipiracil were the only available drugs and often provided limited clinical benefit compared to best supportive care. Results from subsequent practice-changing trials opened several novel therapeutic avenues, both for unselected patients (such as trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab or fruquintinib) and for subgroups defined by the presence of actionable alterations in their tumours (such as HER2-targeted therapies or KRASG12C inhibitors) or with no acquired mechanisms of resistance to the previously received targeted agents in circulating tumour DNA (such as retreatment with anti-EGFR antibodies). In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of advances in the field over the past few years and offer a practical perspective on translation of the most relevant results into the daily management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using an evidence-based algorithm. Finally, we discuss some of the most appealing ongoing areas of research and highlight approaches with the potential to further expand the therapeutic armamentarium.
© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: C.C. has acted as an adviser and/or consultant of AstraZeneca, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Takeda and Tempus; declares speaker’s fees from Amgen, Bayer, MSD, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier and Takeda; and has received research grants from Amgen, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seagen (Pfizer), Servier, Tempus. C.A. has acted as a consultant and/or adviser of Takeda and has received speaker’s fees from Merck. The other authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Shiu, K.-K. et al. LBA32 Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): 5-year follow-up of the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-177 study. Ann. Oncol. 34, S1271–S1272 (2023). - DOI
-
- Cremolini, C. et al. Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 21, 497–507 (2020). - PubMed - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
