Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 18;18(1):35.
doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00649-3.

Reducing stigma and improving access to care for people with mental health conditions in the community: protocol for a multi-site feasibility intervention study (Indigo-Local)

Affiliations

Reducing stigma and improving access to care for people with mental health conditions in the community: protocol for a multi-site feasibility intervention study (Indigo-Local)

Maya Semrau et al. Int J Ment Health Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Stigma and discrimination towards people with mental health conditions by their communities are common worldwide. This can result in a range of negative outcomes for affected persons, including poor access to health care. However, evidence is still patchy from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on affordable, community-based interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma and to improve access to mental health care.

Methods: This study aims to conduct a feasibility (proof-of-principle) pilot study that involves developing, implementing and evaluating a community-based, multi-component, awareness-raising intervention (titled Indigo-Local), designed to reduce stigma and discrimination and to increase referrals of people with mental health conditions for assessment and treatment. It is being piloted in seven sites in five LMICs-China, Ethiopia, India, Nepal and Tunisia-and includes several key components: a stakeholder group workshop; a stepped training programme (using a 'Training of Trainers' approach) of community health workers (or similar cadres of workers) and service users that includes repeated supervision and booster sessions; community engagement activities; and a media campaign. Social contact and service user involvement are instrumental to all components. The intervention is being evaluated through a mixed-methods pre-post study design that involves quantitative assessment of stigma outcomes measuring knowledge, attitudes and (discriminatory) behaviour; quantitative evaluation of mental health service utilization rates (optional, where feasible in sites); qualitative exploration of the potential effectiveness and impact of the Indigo-Local intervention; a process evaluation; implementation evaluation; and an evaluation of implementation costs.

Discussion: The output of this study will be a contextually adapted, evidence-based intervention to reduce mental health-related stigma in local communities in five LMICs to achieve improved access to healthcare. We will have replicable models of how to involve people with lived experience as an integral part of the intervention and will produce knowledge of how intervention content and implementation strategies vary across settings. The intervention and its delivery will be refined to be feasible and ready for larger-scale implementation and evaluation. This study thereby has the potential to make an important contribution to the evidence base on what works to reduce mental health-related stigma and discrimination and improve access to health care.

Keywords: Access to care; Community awareness; Low- and middle-income countries; Mental health; Protocol; Stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The Indigo-Local study has full ethics approval from the PNM Research Ethics Subcommittee of King’s College London as part of the Indigo Partnership Research Programme (reference number HR-19/20–17252), as well as local ethics approvals in each of the seven Indigo Partnership sites. The research is being carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants are required to give their informed consent to participate in the study. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of Indigo-Local intervention and its proposed pathways with outcomes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example timeline and sequence for the key components of the Indigo-Local intervention

Update of

References

    1. Pescosolido B, Medina T, Martin J, Long JS. The “backbone” of stigma: identifying the global core of public prejudice associated with mental illness. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(5):853–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1963.
    1. Thornicroft G. Shunned: discrimination against people with mental illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
    1. Thornicroft G, Sunkel C, Aliev AA, Baker S, Brohan E, El Chammay R, et al. The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health. Lancet. 2022;400(10361):1438–80. - PubMed
    1. Koschorke M, Hussain Al-Haboubi Y, Tseng P-C, Semrau M, Eaton J. Mental health, stigma and neglected tropical diseases: a review and systematic mapping of the evidence. Front Trop Dis. 2022;3: 808955. 10.3389/fitd.2022.808955.

LinkOut - more resources