Development of a peer-delivered lethal means counseling intervention for firearm owning veterans: Peer engagement and exploration of responsibility and safety (PEERS)
- PMID: 39558811
- PMCID: PMC12203803
- DOI: 10.1111/sltb.13138
Development of a peer-delivered lethal means counseling intervention for firearm owning veterans: Peer engagement and exploration of responsibility and safety (PEERS)
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to adapt and expand an evidence-based lethal means counseling intervention for peer-delivery among firearm owning Veterans. We further sought to assess Veteran interventionists' fidelity to motivational interviewing (MI) in the context of the adapted intervention.
Methods: An iterative expert panel comprised of experts in suicide prevention, lethal means counseling, MI, and Veteran peer engagement (N = 9) informed intervention adaptation. Experts rated the appropriateness of the adapted intervention, named Peer Engagement and Exploration of Responsibility and Safety (PEERS), and associated interventionist training plan across six criteria. Veteran interventionists (N = 3) were trained to deliver PEERS and their fidelity to MI in the context of PEERS was evaluated.
Results: Expert panelists' average rating was 7.6 (out of 9). Ratings across all criteria (e.g., quality of the training plan; perceived ability of interventionists to engage in the intervention) were high. Interventionists' composite MI fidelity scores suggested most were client-centered, but not MI-competent in their delivery.
Conclusion: Findings suggest that PEERS is an appropriate lethal means counseling intervention for firearm owning Veterans that can be somewhat feasibly delivered by Veteran interventionists. This intervention could help expand the reach and effectiveness of lethal means counseling.
Keywords: expert panel; fidelity; motivational interviewing; secure; storage; suicide prevention.
Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Anestis reported receiving grants from the Department of Defense, Military Suicide Research Consortium, New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services, New Jersey Office of the Secretary of Higher Education outside of the submitted work. Dr. Anestis also reported receiving royalties from Oxford University Press and speaking fees on related topics outside of the submitted work. Dr. Bryan reported receiving grants from the Department of Defense, National Institute of Mental Health, Bob Woodruff Foundation, USAA Foundation, The Boeing Company, and Navy SEAL Foundation outside of the submitted work. Dr. Bryan also reported receiving consulting fees from Oui Therapeutics and Vita Health, personal fees from Anduril LLC, and royalties from Guilford, Oxford University Press, Routledge, and Springer outside of the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
References
-
- Ajzen I (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
-
- Anestis MD, Bond AE, Bryan AO, & Bryan CJ (2021). An examination of preferred messengers on firearm safety for suicide prevention. Preventive Medicine, 145, 106452. - PubMed
-
- Anestis MD, Bryan CJ, Capron DW, & Bryan AO (2021). Lethal means counseling, distribution of cable locks, and safe firearm storage practices among the Mississippi National Guard: A factorial randomized controlled trial, 2018–2020. American Journal of Public Health, 111(2), 309–317. 10.2105/ajph.2020.306019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
