Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 27:5:837-845.
doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3403948. eCollection 2024.

Anatomy-Informed Multimodal Learning for Myocardial Infarction Prediction

Affiliations

Anatomy-Informed Multimodal Learning for Myocardial Infarction Prediction

Ivan-Daniel Sievering et al. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. .

Abstract

Goal: In patients with coronary artery disease, the prediction of future cardiac events such as myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major challenge. In this work, we propose a novel anatomy-informed multimodal deep learning framework to predict future MI from clinical data and Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA) images. Methods: The images are analyzed by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) guided by anatomical information, and the clinical data by an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Embeddings from both sources are then merged to provide a patient-level prediction. Results: The results of our framework on a clinical study of 445 patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes confirms that multimodal learning increases the predictive power and achieves good performance (AUC: [Formula: see text] & F1-Score: [Formula: see text]), which outperforms the prediction obtained by each modality independently as well as that of interventional cardiologists (AUC: 0.54 & F1-Score: 0.18). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt towards combining multimodal data through a deep learning framework for future MI prediction. Although it demonstrates the superiority of multi-modal approaches over single modality, the results do not yet meet the necessary criteria for practical application.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease; deep learning; invasive coronary angiography; multimodal data; myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Annotated ICA images of a patient; two views for each of three different arteries. The boxes indicate different anatomical segments and the red dots that the segment is responsible of future MI.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Anatomy-informed multimodal framework for MI prediction. The patient data is processed by the clinical data block and the two views of each artery are processed by artery blocks. A prediction is provided for each artery and the prediction at the patient level is the maximum of these three predictions. Note that the decision at the artery level is influenced by the clinical data.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Annotated ICA images (left) are converted to a raw image (center) and a mask (right) that indicates the different anatomical segments. The mask is created by generating Gaussian functions centered on the sections' rectangle and using the same width and height.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Single modality ICA framework for MI prediction. The two views of each artery are processed separately before being concatenated together into a bigger feature map. This new feature map is further processed through convolutional layers and poolings to finally provide a patient-level prediction. The ResConvBlock is the set of convolutional blocks connected with skip connections presented in the section III-A.

References

    1. Abubakar I., Tillmann T., and Banerjee A., “Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013,” Lancet, vol. 385, pp. 117–171, 2015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciccarelli G. et al., “Angiography versus hemodynamics to predict the natural history of coronary stenoses: Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation 2 substudy,” Circulation, vol. 137, pp. 1475–1485, 2018. - PubMed
    1. Xaplanteris P. et al., “Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve,” New England J. Med., vol. 379, pp. 250–259, 2018. - PubMed
    1. Stone G. et al., “Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): Final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 377, pp. 2193–2204, 2011. - PubMed
    1. Mandair D., Tiwari P., Simon S., Colborn K., and Rosenberg M., “Prediction of incident myocardial infarction using machine learning applied to harmonized electronic health record data,” BMC Med. Inform. And Decis. Mak., vol. 20, pp. 1–10, 2020. - PMC - PubMed