Zygomatic implants in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy: A retrospective study of 274 zygomatic implants with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years
- PMID: 39559940
Zygomatic implants in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy: A retrospective study of 274 zygomatic implants with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years
Abstract
Purpose: Zygomatic implants are considered one of the last options for the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy when standard implants cannot be placed. They offer several advantages but can also present complications. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of zygomatic implant placement.
Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted, and the inclusion criteria consisted of patients previously treated with zygomatic implants who had Class V or VI maxillary bone atrophy according to Cawood and Howell, and with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years after prosthetic loading. Outcome measures included implant and prosthesis survival rate, biological and biomechanical complications, and Lund-Mackay staging score before and after implant placement.
Results: The study included 78 patients who received a total of 274 zygomatic implants. The mean follow-up period was 90.4 ± 26.0 months. Seventeen implant failures occurred, resulting in a survival rate of 93.8%, with a statistically significant negative correlation with smoking habits (P = 0.049), anchorage to the two zygomatic bone cortices (bicorticality) (P 0.001) and soft tissue complications (P 0.001). The prosthetic success rate was 92.3%. A statistically significant increase in maxillary sinus radiopacity was recorded when comparing the situation before and after surgery (P 0.001), and the intrasinus pathway had a statistically significant influence on that increase (P = 0.003).
Conclusions: Zygomatic implants utilised for rehabilitating patients with severe maxillary atrophy have shown favourable outcomes. Nonetheless, owing to potential complications, strict case selection is necessary, combined with regular recall visits and proper oral hygiene maintenance. Furthermore, this type of surgery necessitates specialised training and expertise on the part of the practitioner.
Keywords: bone atrophy; complications; long-term results; zygomatic implants.
Similar articles
-
Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):e322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.012. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22538025
-
Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):267-81. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014. PMID: 25237671
-
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):11-28. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018. PMID: 29557398 Clinical Trial.
-
Rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla with zygomatic implants: review.J Oral Implantol. 2012 Oct;38(5):653-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00126. Epub 2011 Feb 18. J Oral Implantol. 2012. PMID: 21332329 Review.
-
ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):366-378. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7488. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020. PMID: 32142574
Cited by
-
Optimal bone-implant contact sites in the zygomatic region for quad zygomatic implants placement: a retrospective study in Vietnamese patients on CBCT.BDJ Open. 2025 Jun 20;11(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00350-8. BDJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40541944 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources