Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Dec;14(1):0.
doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2432353. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

Evaluation of waning of IgG antibody responses after rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP and Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola virus disease vaccines: a modelling study from the PREVAC randomized trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Evaluation of waning of IgG antibody responses after rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP and Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola virus disease vaccines: a modelling study from the PREVAC randomized trial

Simon Valayer et al. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP and Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo are WHO-prequalified vaccination regimens against Ebola virus disease (EVD). Challenges associated with measuring long-term clinical protection warrant the evaluation of immune response kinetics after vaccination. Data from a large phase 2 randomized double-blind clinical trial (PREVAC) were used to evaluate waning of anti-Ebola virus (EBOV) glycoprotein (GP1,2) antibody concentrations after rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP or Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination with linear mixed-effect regression models. After a post-vaccination peak, each vaccination strategy was associated with a decrease of anti-EBOV GP1,2 antibody concentrations with distinct kinetics, highlighting a less-rapid decline in antibody levels after vaccination by rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP. One year after administration of the vaccine, antibody concentrations were higher in children compared to adults for both vaccines, although with different effect sizes: 1.74-fold higher concentrations (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.48; 2.02]) for children 12-17 years old to 3.10-fold higher concentrations (95% CI [2.58; 3.69]) for those 1-4 years old compared to adults for Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo versus 1.36-fold (95% CI [1.12; 1.61]) to 1.41-fold (95% CI [1.21; 1.62]) higher than these values for adults, with relatively small changes from one age category of children to another, for rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP. Antibody concentrations also differed according to geographical location, pre-vaccination antibody concentration, and sex. In combination with knowledge on memory response, characterization of the major determinants of immune response durability of both vaccinations may guide future EVD control protocols.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02876328.

Keywords: Ebola virus disease; Western Africa; antibody; immunogenicity; modelling; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Anti-EBOV GP1,2 IgG response (EU/mL) from the post-vaccination peak to 12 months after the first dose of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP or Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo, respectively. (a) (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP) and (d) (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo): Observed and modelled (multivariable models) antibody GMCs over time in vaccine arm and pooled placebo arms in overall population. (b) (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP) and (e) (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo): modelled (multivariable models) IgG GMCs over time in active vaccine arm according to age category. (c) (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP): modelled (multivariable models) IgG GMCs over time in active vaccine arm according to sex. IgG GMCs over time after (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo) vaccination is not presented according to sex, as sex was not included in the model (not significantly associated). Dots represent individually observed serum samples. The dashed horizontal line in each panel indicates 200 EU/mL anti-EBOV GP1,2 IgG concentration. GMC = geometric mean concentration. GP1,2 = glycoprotein. EBOV = Ebola virus.

References

    1. Jacob ST, Crozier I, Fischer WA II, et al. . Ebola virus disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Feb 20;6(1):13. doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0147-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuhn JH, Amarasinghe GK, Perry DL.. Filoviridae. In: Howley PM, Knipe DM, Whelan SPJ, editors. Fields virology. Vol. 1, Emerging viruses. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA: ): Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020. p. 449–503.
    1. European Medicines Agency . Ebola; 2022. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-thr...
    1. Bolay FK, Grandits G, Lane HC, et al. . PREVAIL I cluster vaccination study with rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP as part of a public health response in Liberia. J Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 19;219(10):1634–1641. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy698 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dahlke C, Kasonta R, Lunemann S, et al. . Dose-dependent T-cell dynamics and cytokine cascade following rVSV-ZEBOV immunization. EBioMedicine. 2017 May;19:107–118. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data