Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 19;16(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00396-z.

Decoding VExUS: a practical guide for excelling in point-of-care ultrasound assessment of venous congestion

Affiliations
Review

Decoding VExUS: a practical guide for excelling in point-of-care ultrasound assessment of venous congestion

Taweevat Assavapokee et al. Ultrasound J. .

Abstract

Venous congestion, often associated with elevated right atrial pressure presents a clinical challenge due to its varied manifestations and potential organ damage. Recognizing the manifestations of venous congestion through bedside physical examination or laboratory tests can be challenging. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is emerging as a valuable bedside tool for assessing venous congestion, with the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) technique gaining prominence. VExUS facilitates non-invasive quantification of venous congestion, relying on measurements of the inferior vena cava (IVC) size and Doppler assessments of the hepatic vein (HV), portal vein (PV), and intrarenal vein, thereby providing real-time insights into hemodynamic status and guiding therapeutic interventions. The grading system outlined in VExUS aids in stratifying the severity of congestion. However, achieving proficiency in VExUS requires a comprehensive understanding of Doppler techniques and their clinical applications. This review article provides practical guidance on performing VExUS, encompassing equipment requirements, preparation, machine settings, and examination techniques for assessing the inferior vena cava (IVC), hepatic vein (HV), portal vein (PV), and intrarenal vein. Potential pitfalls and troubleshooting strategies are discussed to ensure accurate interpretation of Doppler waveforms.

Keywords: Point-of-care ultrasound; VExUS; Venous congestion; Venous excess ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication All patients or their next of kin consented to publication of the review article. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hand and probe position for the IVC short axis view with the transducer orientation marker set at 3 o’clock (arrow). IVC, inferior vena cava
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
IVC short-axis view. IVC, inferior vena cava
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hand and probe position for the IVC long axis view with the transducer orientation marker set at 12 o’clock (arrow). IVC, inferior vena cava
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
IVC long-axis view. IVC, inferior vena cava; HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The optimal mesaurement location of the IVC in the long-axis view is either 2 cm below the RA-IVC junction or approximately 1 cm below the HV-IVC junction. IVC, inferior vena cava; RA, right atrium; HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Measurement of the IVC in the short-axis view. IVC, inferior vena cava
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The junction of an imaginary line extending from the xiphoid process to the midaxillary line to visualize the HV in coronal view. HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Position the transducer at the junction of an imaginary line extending from the xiphoid process to the midaxillary line, orienting the orientation marker towards the patient’s right axilla (arrow) to visualize the HV in coronal view. HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Pulsed wave Doppler mode with the sample volume (Doppler gate) positioned within the HV, approximately 1–2 cm away from its junction with the IVC. IVC, inferior vena cava; HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Pulsed-wave Doppler tracing of the HV in abdominal preset. HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Pulsed-wave Doppler tracing of the HV in cardiac preset. HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
a The waveform of the HV, alongside simultaneous ECG, aids in identifying each wave. b The waveform of the HV. HV, hepatic vein; ECG, electrocardiogram
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
The A wave is generated by the contraction of the RA during atrial systole, increasing the RAP and pushing blood backward toward the liver. RA, right atrium; RAP, right atrial pressure; IVC, inferior vena cava; HV, hepatic vein; RV, right ventricle; SVC, superior vena cava; PA, pulmonary artery
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
The S wave arises during ventricular systole when the tricuspid annulus moves towards the cardiac apex, directing blood flow from the HV into the IVC and RA, thereby generating the antegrade S wave. IVC, inferior vena cava; RA, right atrium; HV, hepatic vein; RV, right ventricle; SVC, superior vena cava; PA, pulmonary artery
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
The V wave, appearing towards the end of ventricular systole, represents a transitional phase as the tricuspid annulus returns to its original position, inducing a retrograde wave that may manifest either above or below the baseline. RA, right atrium; IVC, inferior vena cava; HV, hepatic vein; RV, right ventricle; SVC, superior vena cava; PA, pulmonary artery
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
The D wave arises during ventricular diastole when the tricuspid valve opens, permitting blood to travel from the HV into the IVC and subsequently into the RA, thereby generating the antegrade D wave. HV, hepatic vein; IVC, inferior vena cava; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; SVC, superior vena cava; PA, pulmonary artery
Fig. 17
Fig. 17
a Normally, the amplitude of the S-wave exceeds that of the D-wave. As the RAP increases in tandem with RV dysfunction and tricuspid regurgitation, b in mild to moderate venous congestion, the amplitude of the S-wave diminishes, becoming less than that of the D-wave, and c in severe venous congestion, the S-wave reverses its position, rising above the baseline, while only the D-wave remains below the baseline. RAP, right atrial pressure; RV, right ventricle
Fig. 18
Fig. 18
The HV waveform interpretation may be challenging without concurrent ECG tracing. HV, hepatic vein; ECG, electrocardiogram
Fig. 19
Fig. 19
Blunting and reduction in cardiac phasicity may be observed in the HV waveform in conditions such as liver cirrhosis and fatty infiltration. HV, hepatic vein
Fig. 20
Fig. 20
Pulsed wave Doppler mode with the sample volume (Doppler gate) positioned within the PV. PV, portal vein
Fig. 21
Fig. 21
Pulsed-wave Doppler tracing of the PV. PV, portal vein
Fig. 22
Fig. 22
Pulsed-wave Doppler tracing of the PV with hepatic arterial flow interference. PV, portal vein
Fig. 23
Fig. 23
Pulsed-wave Doppler tracing of the PV without hepatic arterial flow interference. PV, portal vein
Fig. 24
Fig. 24
PVPF calculation. PVPF, portal vein pulsatility fraction; Vmax, maximum velocity; Vmin, minimum velocity
Fig. 25
Fig. 25
a The PV waveform typically exhibits a continuous pattern with limited pulsatility and a normal PVPF (< 30%) due to hepatic sinusoids that attenuate the linear transmission of RAP. b In mild to moderate venous congestion, characterized by elevated RAP and RV dysfunction, the PVPF may rise above 30% but remain below 50%. c A PVPF exceeding 50%, with or without systolic flow reversal (below the baseline), indicates severe congestion. PV, portal vein; PVPF, portal vein pulsatility fraction; RAP, right atrial pressure; RV, right ventricle
Fig. 26
Fig. 26
The major renal veins’ anatomy illustration
Fig. 27
Fig. 27
Position the transducer at the junction of an imaginary line extending from the xiphoid process to the postaxillary line, orienting the orientation marker towards the patient’s right axilla (arrow) to visualize the IRV in coronal view. IRV, intrarenal vein
Fig. 28
Fig. 28
Pulsed wave Doppler mode with the sample volume (Doppler gate) positioned within the IRV. IRV, intrarenal vein
Fig. 29
Fig. 29
Pulsed-wave Doppler tracing of the IRV and the IRA. IRV, intrarenal vein; IRA, intrarenal artery
Fig. 30
Fig. 30
a Under normal conditions, the IRVD exhibits a continuous pattern with minimal pulsatility and no interruptions. b However, mild to moderate venous congestion results in heightened pulsatility and interruptions in the waveform, characterized by distinct systolic (S) and diastolic (D) waves. c In severe congestion, S-reversal occurs similarly to that of the HV, leaving only the D-wave below the baseline. IRVD, intrarenal vein Doppler; HV, hepatic vein; IRA, intrarenal artery; IRV, intrarenal vein
Fig. 31
Fig. 31
The VExUS grading system categorizes congestion based on IVC diameter and Doppler findings in HV, PV, and IRV. An IVC diameter ≤ 2 cm indicates grade 0 (no congestion). Grades 1–3 are defined by abnormalities in HV, PV, and IRV Doppler. Mild to moderate HVD abnormalities have S-wave < D-wave but still below baseline; severe abnormalities exhibit S-wave reversal. PVPF of 30–50% is mild to moderate, while > 50% is severe. IRVD is mild to moderate with pulsatility and distinct S/D waves, severe with monophasic D-only pattern. Grade 1 has no severe waveform, grade 2 has one severe waveform, and grade 3 has ≥ 2 severe waveforms, indicating severe congestion. VExUS, venous excess ultrasound; IVC, inferior vena cava; HV, hepatic vein; PV, portal vein; IRV, intrarenal vein; PVPF, portal vein pulsatility fraction; HVD, hepatic vein Doppler; PVD, portal vein Doppler; IRVD, intrarenal vein Doppler

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Persichini R, Lai C, Teboul JL, Adda I, Guérin L, Monnet X (2022) Venous return and mean systemic filling pressure: physiology and clinical applications. Crit Care 26(1):150 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyton AC (1955) Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiol Rev 35(1):123–129 - PubMed
    1. Guyton AC, Lindsey AW, Abernathy B, Richardson T (1957) Venous return at various right atrial pressures and the normal venous return curve. Am J Physiol 189(3):609–615 - PubMed
    1. Nagueh SF, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA (1996) Relation of mean right atrial pressure to echocardiographic and Doppler parameters of right atrial and right ventricular function. Circulation 93(6):1160–1169 - PubMed
    1. Duerinckx AJ, Grant EG, Perrella RR, Szeto A, Tessler FN (1990) The pulsatile portal vein in cases of congestive heart failure: correlation of duplex Doppler findings with right atrial pressures. Radiology 176(3):655–658 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources