Advancing Rabies Diagnosis: Time for a New "Gold Standard"?
- PMID: 39560914
- DOI: 10.1007/s40291-024-00758-2
Advancing Rabies Diagnosis: Time for a New "Gold Standard"?
Abstract
Rabies, a neglected zoonosis, claims approximately 60,000 lives globally each year. One of the significant challenges in rabies control efforts is the lack of surveillance data and underreporting, stemming from inadequate diagnostic facilities, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. At present, the World Health Organization recognizes the fluorescent antibody test (FAT) on postmortem brain specimens as the "gold standard" for confirming rabies in humans and animals. In this opinion article, we highlight several limitations of FAT and advocate for superior alternatives to replace it as the reference diagnostic technique for rabies. We argue that molecular techniques, specifically PCR-based methods, offer rapid, accurate, and convenient means of laboratory confirmation for rabies. Their implementation is now feasible due to the expanded technical and logistical capabilities achieved during the COVID-19 pandemic.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: This Opinion received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Conflict of interest: The authors (R.S.M., L.L., and A.M.A.) declare no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Consent: Not applicable. Code availability: Not applicable. Data availability: Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Author contributions: R.S.M. conceptualized the manuscript and contributed to manuscript drafting and finalization. L.L. principally drafted and visualized the manuscript. A.M.A. contributed to manuscript development, drafting, and finalization. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
References
-
- WHO. WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies: WHO TRS N°1012 [Internet]. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 5]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-TRS-1012 .
-
- Swedberg C, Mazeri S, Mellanby RJ, Hampson K, Chng NR. Implementing a one health approach to rabies surveillance: lessons from integrated bite case management. Front Trop Dis [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 May 2];3:1. /pmc/articles/PMC7614337/.
-
- Claassen JAHR. The gold standard: not a golden standard. Br Med J [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 Oct 8];330:1121. /pmc/articles/PMC557893/.
-
- World Health Organization. Technical Report Series No. 28: Expert Committee on Rabies. Report on the First Session. Geneva; 1950.
-
- World Health Organization. Technical Report Series No. 82. Expert Committee on Rabies. Second Report. Geneva; 1954.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
