Anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with early breast cancer carrying germline BRCA1/2 mutation: the BRCAN study
- PMID: 39561108
- PMCID: PMC12396947
- DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae299
Anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with early breast cancer carrying germline BRCA1/2 mutation: the BRCAN study
Abstract
Background: BRCA1/2 genes play a critical role in genome stability and DNA repair. In animal models, loss of cardiomyocyte-specific BRCA1/2 is associated with DNA damage, apoptosis, cardiac dysfunction, and mortality following anthracycline exposure. However, whether these preclinical findings translate to humans remains unclear.
Objective: Assess the impact of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) status on anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) in patients with early breast cancer and no prior anti-HER2 therapy.
Methods: This single-center retrospective/prospective cohort study focused on early breast cancer patients, treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the neo/adjuvant setting, no prior anti-HER2 therapy, and known gBRCA1/2 status, normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and no previous cardiovascular disease. Follow-up assessments involved myocardial dysfunction blood biomarkers (MDBB), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. The primary objective was LVEF changes comparing BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (gBRCA1/2m) vs non-carriers (gBRCA1/2wt). Secondary objectives included differences in MDBB and QoL.
Results: A total of 137 patients were included (103 gBRCA1/2wt and 34 gBRCA1/2m). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared to baseline, LVEF% reduction was -4.7[-12.0, 0.0] vs -9.5[-18.0, -5.0] in gBRCA1/2wt vs gBRCA1/2m, (P = .027). After adjusting for confounders, the difference in reduction in LVEF remained statistically significant at -4.5 [95%CI, -8.6, -0.4; P = .032]. No differences between MDBB (C-reactive protein, hsTnI, NT-proBNP, D-Dimer, ST-2, or Galectine-3) or QoL (MLHFQ and EQ5-D index) were detected.
Conclusions: gBRCA1/2m patients could represent a higher-risk population for AIC. gBRCA1/2 status should be one of the factors to consider in deciding on adjuvant anthracycline necessity. This population could benefit from a cardio-oncology closer follow-up and cardioprotective strategies.
Keywords: BRCA1/2; anthracyclines; breast cancer; cardio-oncology; cardiotoxicity.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Alfonso Cortés-Salgado reported consulting/advisory relationship with GSK, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer; research funding from Pfizer; expert testimony for GSK, AstraZeneca, Accord Healthcare, and Pfizer; and travel expenses from Pfizer and GSK. Carmen Guillén-Ponce reported research funding (institutional): QED Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boston, Erytech, IPSEN, Panbela Therapeutics, Oncosil Medical; expert testimony: Boston; travel, accommodations, expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, GE Healthcare. Eva Guerra has received advisory/consultancy honorarium from AstraZeneca-MSD, Clovis Oncology, GSK-Tesaro, PharmaMar, and Roche; has received speaker bureau/expert testimony honorarium from AstraZeneca-MSD, PharmaMar, Roche, GSK-Tesaro, Clovis, and Eisai; and has received travel/accommodation/expenses from Roche, GSK-Tesaro, and Baxter. María Fernández-Abad reported honoraria from Lilly, Novartis, Eisai, Ferrer, Persan, AstraZeneca/Daiichi; and Scientific Advisory Board for Lilly and Seagen. Maria Gion has received honoraria from Novartis, Gilead, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer; travel grants and accommodation from Roche, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca; and serves on advisory board for Gilead and AstraZeneca. Pilar Garrido reported consultancy/honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; direct funding from Medscape and Touch Medical; institutional research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, IO Biotech, Lilly, MSD, Roche, and Takeda. The other authors indicated no financial relationships.
Figures




References
-
- Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. , Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024. Accessed February 24, 2024https://gco.iarc.who.int/today
-
- Ayala de la Peña F, Antolín Novoa S, Gavila Gregori J, et al. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (2022). Clin Transl Oncol. 2023;25:2647-2664. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12094-023-03215-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, et al. ; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;379:432-444. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Omland T, Heck SL, Gulati G.. The role of cardioprotection in cancer therapy cardiotoxicity: JACC: CardioOncology state-of-the-art review. JACC CardioOncology. 2022;4:19-37. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.01.101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2768-2801. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw211 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous