Distribution and predictors of haemophilia-related costs in the United Kingdom: analysis of the CHESS I and CHESS II burden of illness studies
- PMID: 39563410
- PMCID: PMC11577900
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11850-y
Distribution and predictors of haemophilia-related costs in the United Kingdom: analysis of the CHESS I and CHESS II burden of illness studies
Abstract
Background: Few studies have evaluated direct medical or societal costs of haemophilia in the United Kingdom (UK), and how patient characteristics impact future costs is uncertain. Cost predictors were identified and examined using cross-sectional data from the CHESS I and II studies.
Methods: Patient- and physician-reported outcomes were analysed for UK adult males aged ≤ 65, with haemophilia A or B and no recent clinical trial participation. Demographics, haemophilia type and severity, inhibitors, annual bleed rate (ABR), problem joints (PJs), treatment type, and comorbidities, were utilised in regression analyses. Health-related quality of life was assessed using EQ-5D. Generalised linear models estimated expected non-drug haemophilia-related direct medical costs (DMC) and societal costs (non-drug DMC, direct non-medical and indirect costs). Average marginal effects (AMEs) determined predictors of cost.
Results: Costs for 378 patients were analysed. Mean age was 33 years and 79% (299) had haemophilia A. Mean annual per-patient DMC were £165,001 (including factor treatment costs) and £4,091 when excluding factor replacement treatment costs (non-drug DMC). Mean annual per-patient non-treatment societal costs were £11,550 (standard deviation £20,171) among those with data available (n = 51). Number of PJs, ABR, and treatment regimen were significant determinants of haemophilia-related non-drug DMC (all P < 0.001). Non-drug DMC increased as ABR increased (AMEs were £2,018 for ABR 1-5, £3,101 for ABR 6-10 and £5,785 for ABR ≥ 11, vs. ABR 0) and by £1,869 per additional PJ. No significant predictors of non-drug haemophilia-related societal costs were identified. Mean EQ-5D score was 0.66, with lower scores observed for people with haemophilia B (0.48) compared with haemophilia A (0.71) and with increasing haemophilia severity.
Conclusions: UK direct medical and societal costs of haemophilia are substantial. Non-drug DMC were particularly associated with ABR and number of PJs. These findings may be useful for real-world evaluations of the economic burden of haemophilia in the UK.
Keywords: Annual bleed rate; Burden; Cost; Haemophilia; Problem joint; Quality of life.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Peyvandi F, Garagiola I, Biguzzi E. Advances in the treatment of bleeding disorders. J Thromb Haemost Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2016;14:2095–106. - PubMed
-
- Blanchette VS, Key NS, Ljung LR, Manco-Johnson MJ, van den Berg HM, Srivastava A. Definitions in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12:1935–9. - PubMed
-
- Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, Kitchen S, Sutherland M, Pipe SW, Carcao M, Mahlangu J, Ragni MV, Windyga J, Llinás A, Goddard NJ, Mohan R, Poonnoose PM, Feldman BM, Lewis SZ, Berg HM, Pierce GF. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia 2020;26:1–158. - PubMed
-
- Castaman G, Coppens M, Pipe SW. Etranacogene dezaparvovec for the treatment of adult patients with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B. Expert Rev Hematol. 2023;16(12):919–32. 10.1080/17474086.2023.2276206. - PubMed
-
- Hassan S, Cannavò A, Gouw SC, Rosendaal FR, van der Bom JG. Factor VIII products and inhibitor development in previously treated patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia A: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost Elsevier. 2018;16:1055–68. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical