Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 19:16:17588359241296386.
doi: 10.1177/17588359241296386. eCollection 2024.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment guided radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer-exploratory results on nonoperative cohort of a multicenter prospective study

Affiliations

Comprehensive geriatric assessment guided radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer-exploratory results on nonoperative cohort of a multicenter prospective study

Yue-Xin Yang et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the main treatment for elderly patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer who are ineligible for or decline surgery, but the optimal modality remains unclear.

Objectives: This study was to validate the safety and efficacy of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) guided radiotherapy in older patients.

Design: An exploratory analysis of a single-arm, multicenter, Phase II trial.

Methods: Patients aged over 70 and diagnosed with rectal cancer were enrolled and evaluated by CGA. CGA-guided radiotherapy was individually conducted in a multidisciplinary setting. Patients in fit, intermediate, and frail groups were scheduled to receive CRT, long-course radiotherapy, and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) alone respectively. Patients who were unfit for or refused surgery were analyzed for acute toxicities and survival outcomes.

Results: In a total of 109 enrolled patients, 47 individuals who did not undergo surgery were included, with 26, 9, and 12 categorized into fit, intermediate, and frail groups. Only 11 (23.4%) grade 3 or above toxicities were observed overall. Within a median follow-up of 69.0 months, the 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 44.3% (95% CI: 32.1%-61.2%), 25.5% (95% CI: 15.7%-41.6%) and 61.0% (95% CI: 47.8%-77.6%) in total. The 5-year OS, PFS, and CSS reached 15.0% (95% CI: 7.4%-30.3%), 14.6% (95% CI: 7.3%-29.4%), and 36.2% (95% CI: 22.0%-59.4%), with no significant difference among the three subgroups. SCRT (p < 0.001) and dose boost (p = 0.045) contributed to lower tumor-related death rates in multiple competing risk regressions.

Conclusion: Radiotherapy guided by CGA was effective and well-tolerated in non-surgical elderly patients. SCRT alone seemed to achieve similar clinical outcomes as CRT in corresponding subgroups. However, given the limited size of this study, further investigation in a larger population is still needed for this strategy.

Keywords: chemoradiotherapy; comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA); elderly patients; inoperable; rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram. The enrollment and selection procedures of the analyzed cohort.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival outcomes of the whole cohort presented by the Kaplan-Meier method. (a) Overall survival curve; (b) progression-free survival curve; (c) cancer-specific survival curve; (d) local-regional free survival curve.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival outcomes of separate CGA subgroups presented by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. (a) Overall survival curve; (b) progression-free survival curve; (c) cancer-specific survival curve; (d) local-regional free survival curve (p > 0.05).

References

    1. Fokas E, Glynne-Jones R, Fleischmann M, et al.. Radiotherapy dose escalation using endorectal brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer unsuitable for surgery: lessons from studies in fit patients and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 112: 102490. - PubMed
    1. Rutten HJ, den Dulk M, Lemmens VE, et al.. Controversies of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in elderly patients. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 494–501. - PubMed
    1. Myint AS, Gerard JP. Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer in older patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46: 349–357. - PubMed
    1. Ketelaers SHJ, Jacobs A, Verrijssen A-SE, et al.. A multidisciplinary approach for the personalised non-operative management of elderly and frail rectal cancer patients unable to undergo TME surgery. Cancers 2022; 14(10): 2368. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hathout L, Maloney-Patel N, Malhotra U, et al.. Management of locally advanced rectal cancer in the elderly: a critical review and algorithm. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9: 363–376. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources