The psychological empowerment and quality of work life among Jordanian primary care nurses and midwives
- PMID: 39564512
- PMCID: PMC11573508
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1476225
The psychological empowerment and quality of work life among Jordanian primary care nurses and midwives
Abstract
Introduction: The healthcare industry, particularly in the context of primary care, presents various challenges to nurses and midwives, influencing their psychological empowerment (PE) and quality of work life (QWL).
Objective: This study's objective is to assess the levels of PE and QWL among Jordanian primary care nurses and midwives and explore the relationship between PE and QWL.
Methods: Utilizing a descriptive correlational design, the study included 273 Jordanian primary care nurses and midwives through convenience sampling. The Psychological Empowerment Instrument and Brook's Quality of Nursing Work Life Survey were used to measure PE and QWL. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics to describe the study participant's characteristics and inferential analysis such as Pearson correlation, and multiple regression to examine relationships and identify predictors of study variables.
Results: The study found that the QWL scale had high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.954), and similarly, the PE scale demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.948). Moving on to the core findings, significant positive correlations were identified between PE and QWL, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.568 (p < 0.01), indicating that higher levels of psychological empowerment were associated with better quality of work life. Furthermore, the regression analysis revealed that PE accounted for approximately 32.3% of the variability in QWL scores. Interestingly, participants holding diplomas reported the highest QWL scores (mean = 136.14), while those contemplating leaving the nursing profession displayed significantly lower QWL scores (mean = 114.14). No significant correlations were found between PE and sociodemographic variables such as age, income, and years of experience.
Conclusion: This study reveals a crucial need to enhance PE and QWL. Key findings show moderate PE and QWL levels, with variations based on educational background and workplace. The positive correlation between PE and QWL identifies the benefits of fostering empowerment through professional development, job autonomy, and decision-making. These insights are vital for improving nursing practice and policy and enhancing nurse satisfaction and patient care.
Keywords: Jordan; UN sustainability goals; midwives; nurses; primary care; psychological empowerment; quality of work life.
Copyright © 2024 Al-Obiedat, Allari and Gharaibeh.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
The Relationship Between Psychological Empowerment and Clinical Decision-Making Among Staff Nurses in Governmental Hospital in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.Cureus. 2024 Mar 25;16(3):e56871. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56871. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38659519 Free PMC article.
-
The mediating role of professional values and self-efficacy in the relationship between organizational justice and quality of working life among nurses in southwestern Iran.BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 29;24(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03111-y. BMC Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40301859 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting the quality of working life among nurses caring for Syrian refugee camps in Jordan.Hum Resour Health. 2024 Jan 2;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00884-8. Hum Resour Health. 2024. PMID: 38167317 Free PMC article.
-
The nature nursing quality of work life: an integrative review of literature.West J Nurs Res. 2011 Oct;33(6):786-804. doi: 10.1177/0193945910378855. Epub 2010 Aug 18. West J Nurs Res. 2011. PMID: 20719995 Review.
-
The quality of work life of registered nurses in Canada and the United States: a comprehensive literature review.Int J Occup Environ Health. 2016 Oct;22(4):341-358. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2016.1241920. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2016. PMID: 27734769 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Brooks BA, Anderson MA. Defining quality of nursing work life. Nurs Econ. (2005) 23:319–26, 279. PMID: - PubMed
-
- Stefana E, Marciano F, Rossi D, Cocca P, Tomasoni G. Composite indicators to measure quality of working life in Europe: a systematic review. Soc Indic Res. (2021) 157:1047–78. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02688-6 - DOI
-
- Chiat LC, Panatik SA. Perceptions of employee turnover intention by Herzberg’s motivation-hygiene theory: a systematic literature review. J Res Psychol. (2019) 1:10–5. doi: 10.31580/jrp.v1i2.949 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources