Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446336.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46336.

Use of Biologic or Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Cancer Risk

Affiliations

Use of Biologic or Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Cancer Risk

Xavier Sendaydiego et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: The Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Surveillance demonstrated an increased cancer risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) taking tofacitinib compared with those taking tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). Although international cohort studies have compared cancer outcomes between TNFis, non-TNFi drugs, and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKis), their generalizability to US patients with RA is limited.

Objective: To assess the comparative safety of TNFis, non-TNFi drugs, and JAKis among US patients with RA (ie, the cancer risk associated with the use of these drugs among these patients).

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used US administrative claims data from Merative Marketscan Research Databases from November 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. Follow-up occurred up to 2 years after initiation of biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Participants included individuals aged 18 to 64 years with RA, identified using at least 2 RA International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnostic codes on or before the date of TNFi, non-TNFi, or JAKi initiation ("index date"). Statistical analysis took place from June 2022 to September 2024.

Exposures: New initiations of TNFis, abatacept, interleukin 6 inhibitors (IL-6is), rituximab, or JAKis. Individuals could contribute person-time to more than 1 treatment exposure if treatment escalation mimicked typical clinical practice but were censored if they switched to a previously trialed medication class.

Main outcomes and measures: Incident cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer, after at least 90 days and within 2 years of initiation of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs. Outcomes were associated with the most recent drug exposure.

Results: Of the 25 305 individuals who initiated treatment and who met the inclusion criteria, most were female (19 869 [79%]), had a median age of 50 years (IQR, 42-56 years), and were from the South US (12 516 [49%]). Of a total 27 661 drug exposures, drug initiations consisted of 20 586 TNFi exposures (74%), 2570 JAKi exposures (9%), 2255 abatacept exposures (8%), 1182 rituximab exposures (4%), and 1068 IL-6i exposures (4%). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that rituximab was associated with a higher risk of incident cancer compared with TNFis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; 95% CI, 1.17-3.14), followed by abatacept (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.03-2.11), and JAKis (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.94-1.96).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of individuals with RA and new biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD exposures, individuals initiating rituximab, abatacept, and JAKis demonstrated higher incidence rates and statistically significantly increased risks of incident cancers compared with those initiating TNFis in the first 2 years after initiation of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs. Given the limitations of administrative claims data and confounding by indication, it is likely that these patients may have a higher disease burden, resulting in channeling bias. To better understand these associations, larger studies with longer follow-up time are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Reid reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie and Amgen outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Reid had a patent pending for interleukin 6 axis inhibitors for viral infection–associated pneumonitis. Dr D. F. L. Liew reported receiving personal fees from the Australian government outside the submitted work. Dr Goulabchand reported receiving nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca and personal fees from Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr A. G. Singh reported receiving grants from AbbVie Pharmaceuticals and Sonoma Biotherapeutics outside the submitted work. Dr Sparks reported receiving grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sonoma Biotherapeutics; and personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Fresenius Kab, Gilead, Inova Diagnostics, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, MustangBio, Novartis, Optum, Pfizer, ReCor, Sana, Sobi, and UCB outside the submitted work. Dr Jarvik reported receiving the Comparative Effectiveness, Radiology Research Academic Fellowship and travel reimbursement from GE Healthcare; and royalties from Wolters Kluwer/UpToDate and Springer Publishing. Dr S. Singh reported receiving grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Design and Directions of Drug Class Switching
JAKi indicates Janus kinase inhibitor; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Study Flow Diagram
IL-6i indicates interleukin 6 inhibitor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; and TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. aPatients could have taken more than 1 drug class, so the total sums to more than 25 305.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Survival Curves Generated From Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Models for Time to Incident Cancer by Drug Class Exposure and Adjusted for Covariates
Models adjusted for individual covariates: demographic characteristics (age, sex, geographic region, and year of initiating biologic), proxies of rheumatoid arthritis severity (glucocorticoid and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug prescription fills and number of drug switches), clinical characteristics (number of days from rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis to biologic initiation, tobacco use, frailty status,, and Charlson comorbidity score), and health care utilization within 12 months prior to starting treatment (hospital admissions, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, opioid or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription fills, and number of days of follow-up). HR indicates hazard ratio, IL-6i, interleukin 6 inhibitor; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; and TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1094-1108. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60826-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagust A, Boland A, Hockenhull J, et al. . Rituximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(suppl 2):23-29. doi:10.3310/hta13suppl2-04 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frampton JE, Scott LJ. Rituximab: in rheumatoid arthritis. BioDrugs. 2007;21(5):333-341. doi:10.2165/00063030-200721050-00005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, et al. ; REFLEX Trial Group . Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2793-2806. doi:10.1002/art.22025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Porter D, van Melckebeke J, Dale J, et al. . Tumour necrosis factor inhibition versus rituximab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who require biological treatment (ORBIT): an open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority, trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):239-247. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00380-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms