Treatment approaches to horses with acute diarrhea admitted to referral institutions: A multicenter retrospective study
- PMID: 39565809
- PMCID: PMC11578493
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313783
Treatment approaches to horses with acute diarrhea admitted to referral institutions: A multicenter retrospective study
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to describe and compare therapeutic approaches for horses with acute diarrhea in different geographic regions worldwide.
Methods: Clinical information was retrospectively collected from diarrheic horses presented to participating institutions between 2016 and 2020, including fluid therapy on admission, antimicrobial drugs, probiotics, anti-endotoxic medications, anti-inflammatory drugs, gastroprotectants, digital cryotherapy, and toxin-binding agents. Seasonal and geographic differences were investigated.
Results: 1438 horses from 26 participating hospitals from 5 continents were included. On admission, 65% (926/1419) of horses were administered a fluid bolus. Antimicrobial drugs were administered to 55% (792/1419) within the first 24 hours of admission, with penicillin and gentamicin being the most used combination (25%, 198/792). Horses with leukopenia (OR: 2.264, 95%CI: 1.754 to 2.921; P<0.001) or meeting systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (OR: 2.542, 95%CI: 1.919 to 3.368; P<0.001) had higher odds of being administered antimicrobial drugs. Other treatments administered included probiotics (15%, 215/1438), polymyxin B (13%; 187/1438), pentoxifylline (8%; 118/1438), gastroprotectants (44%; 626/1419), digital cryotherapy (34%; 489/1435), plasma transfusion (13%; 182/1410) and toxin-binding agents (36%; 515/1438).
Limitations: Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the rationale for treatment decisions was unavailable, and associations with survival could not be evaluated.
Conclusions: Treatments varied between hospitals from different geographic regions. Prospective clinical trials are required to evaluate the effects of various treatments on survival.
Copyright: © 2024 Gomez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic approaches, aetiological agents and their associations with short-term survival and laminitis in horses with acute diarrhoea admitted to referral institutions.Equine Vet J. 2024 Sep;56(5):959-969. doi: 10.1111/evj.14024. Epub 2023 Nov 20. Equine Vet J. 2024. PMID: 37984355
-
Survival rates and factors associated with survival and laminitis of horses with acute diarrhoea admitted to referral institutions.Equine Vet J. 2024 Sep;56(5):970-981. doi: 10.1111/evj.14032. Epub 2023 Dec 11. Equine Vet J. 2024. PMID: 38083907
-
Diagnosis and Treatment of Undifferentiated and Infectious Acute Diarrhea in the Adult Horse.Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2018 Apr;34(1):39-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.002. Epub 2018 Feb 14. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2018. PMID: 29426709 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Saccharomyces boulardii viability and efficacy in horses with antimicrobial-induced diarrhoea.Vet Rec. 2013 Feb 2;172(5):128. doi: 10.1136/vr.100833. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Vet Rec. 2013. PMID: 23161811 Clinical Trial.
-
Review of oral rehydration solutions for horses with diarrhoea.Aust Vet J. 1997 Jun;75(6):417-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1997.tb14345.x. Aust Vet J. 1997. PMID: 9247691 Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Cohen ND, Woods AM. Characteristics and risk factors for failure of horses with acute diarrhea to survive: 122 cases (1990–1996). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999. Feb;214(3):382–90. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical