The association of where patients with prostate cancer live and receive care on racial treatment inequities
- PMID: 39565920
- PMCID: PMC11972675
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae302
The association of where patients with prostate cancer live and receive care on racial treatment inequities
Erratum in
-
Correction to: The association of where patients with prostate cancer live and receive care on racial treatment inequities.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Aug 1;117(8):1756. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf142. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025. PMID: 40511961 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correction to: The association of where patients with prostate cancer live and receive care on racial treatment inequities.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Aug 1;117(8):1757. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf148. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025. PMID: 40569660 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Black individuals are less likely to be treated for prostate cancer even though they are more than twice as likely to die compared with White individuals. The complex causes of these inequities are influenced by social and structural factors, including racism, which contribute to the differential delivery of care. This study investigates how factors related to the location of where individuals live and receive care affect treatment inequities for prostate cancer between Black and White individuals. We hypothesize that both location and race independently influence treatment inequities.
Methods: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry linked to Medicare claims to estimate the treatment inequity, as defined by differences in radiation or radical prostatectomy. Fixed effects at the physician, hospital, and patient ZIP code levels were incorporated to adjust for all time-invariant factors at these levels.
Results: The results indicate that residential location-related factors explain only half of the treatment inequity, whereas provider- and hospital-level factors do not significantly account for disparities. Even after accounting for all time-invariant factors, significant differences in treatment rates persist.
Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of understanding race as a social construct and racism as a systemic and structural phenomenon in addressing treatment inequities. These findings provide a necessary step toward understanding equitable care and designing interventions to solve this inequity.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
J.L.G. reports other support from Seagen Pharmaceuticals, Inc and ImmunityBio outside the submitted work. Y.A.N. reports grants from the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE) Fund during the conduct of the study; personal fees from OrthoClinical Diagnostics and ImmunityBio Inc outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other authors.
References
-
- Weinstein JN, Geller A, Negussie Y, Baciu A, eds.; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice C on CBS to PHE in the US. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. National Academies Press; 2017. 10.17226/24624 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
