The use of wearable technology in studies in older adults with cancer: a systematic review
- PMID: 39566085
- PMCID: PMC12395252
- DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae319
The use of wearable technology in studies in older adults with cancer: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing integration of wearable technology in oncology, its application in the care of older adults, representing most patients with cancer, is poorly defined.
Objective: This systematic review aimed to summarize the current use of wearables in studies in older adults with cancer.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on May 1, 2024. Studies involving wearable devices and patients aged ≥60 years diagnosed with cancer were included. Outcomes reported were study characteristics, wearable outcomes, feasibility and adherence. The mixed method appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of included studies.
Results: A total of 31 publications were included, comprising 1298 older patients. Of these, 12 were pilot/feasibility studies, 12 were observational studies, 6 were randomized controlled trials, and 1 was a cross-sectional study. Most studies used wearable data to measure recovery (19 studies, 61%). Physical activity was the most studied wearable outcome (27 studies, 87%). Adherence to the wearable device was documented in 11 of the 31 studies (35%), with adherence ranging from 74% to 100%.
Conclusions: Our systematic review found wearables were mostly used to measure physical activity, with the most common primary aim of measuring recovery. Most studies reported high adherence, although definitions of adherence were diverse. Our results highlight the need for more and larger studies on wearable technology in older cancer patients, the use of standardized reporting frameworks, and increased participation in research in low- and middle-income countries.
Keywords: cancer; digital health; geriatric oncology; geriatrics; older adult; oncology; systematic review; wearable electronic devices; wearable technology.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Garner WB, Smith BD, Ludmir EB, et al. Predicting future cancer incidence by age, race, ethnicity, and sex. J Geriatr Oncol. 2023;14:101393. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.10.008 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Tomorrow (version 1.1). International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024. Accessed June 11, 2024.https://gco.iarc.who.int/today
-
- Aaldriks AA, Maartense E, le Cessie S, et al. Predictive value of geriatric assessment for patients older than 70 years, treated with chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;79:205-212. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baltussen JC, de Glas NA, van Holstein Y, et al. Chemotherapy-related toxic effects and quality of life and physical functioning in older patients. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2339116. https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hamaker ME, Seynaeve C, Wymenga AN, et al. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment is associated with toxicity and survival in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy: results from the omega study of the dutch breast cancer trialists’ group. Breast. 2014;23:81-87. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical