Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e085132.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085132.

Ethical issues in termination of resuscitation decision-making: an interview study with paramedics and relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest non-survivors

Affiliations

Ethical issues in termination of resuscitation decision-making: an interview study with paramedics and relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest non-survivors

Karin Eli et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), decisions to terminate resuscitation or transport the patient to hospital are ethically fraught. However, little is known about paramedics' ethical concerns in these decision-making processes.

Objective: To develop an understanding of how paramedics experience ethical concerns in OHCA decision-making processes, and how this relates to the ethical concerns of patients' relatives.

Design: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with paramedics and relatives of OHCA non-survivors.

Setting: Two ambulance trusts in England.

Participants: Thirty-one paramedics, identified as decision-makers in adult OHCA events in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) had been initiated, were interviewed. Fourteen interviews with relatives of OHCA non-survivors were also conducted.

Analysis: The interviews were analysed thematically, using a coding framework and following an empirical ethics approach.

Results: Four themes were developed: preventing harm to patients, best interests, caring for the patient's family and moral distress. Paramedics conceptualised preventing harm both as saving lives and as preventing an undignified death or a life with severe brain damage. Paramedics' and relatives' views of best interests were influenced by values such as patient dignity and assumptions about age and quality of life. Paramedics expressed a duty of care towards the patient's family. Relatives conveyed the importance of clear communication and acts of care performed by the ambulance crew, underscoring the ethical commitment that paramedics had towards patients' families. Paramedics described decision-making processes that relied on clinical guidelines, rather than personal values and beliefs; this sometimes led to moral distress.

Conclusion: Non-protocolised ethical considerations are important in paramedic decision-making about terminating CPR in OHCA events. While paramedics use established guidelines and processes to reach decisions that prevent patient harm, they experience moral distress when personal convictions clash with guidelines. Training around ethical reasoning and decision making may help paramedics reduce their moral distress and provide consistent and transparent decisions for patients and their families.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; medical ethics; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: A-MS, FG and MAS have been awarded research funding from the National Institute for Health and Social Care Research. A-MS is a member of Resuscitation Council UK’s ReSPECT wider stakeholder group. KE has been awarded research funding from the Medical Research Council. GDP has been awarded research funding from the National Institute for Health and Social Care Research, Resuscitation Council UK, Laerdal Foundation and British Heart Foundation. GDP is a trustee for the Resuscitation Council UK, holds other volunteer roles with the European Resuscitation Council and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, and is an editor for the journals Resuscitation and Resuscitation Plus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mental Capacity Act 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents/enacted Available.
    1. Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee . JRCALC clinical guidelines 2022. Class Professional Publishing; 2022.
    1. Anderson NE, Gott M, Slark J. Beyond prognostication: ambulance personnel’s lived experiences of cardiac arrest decision-making. Emerg Med J. 2018;35:208–13. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206743. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson NE, Gott M, Slark J. Grey areas: New Zealand ambulance personnel’s experiences of challenging resuscitation decision-making. Int Emerg Nurs. 2018;39:62–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milling L, Nielsen DS, Kjær J, et al. Ethical considerations in the prehospital treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-centre, qualitative study. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0284826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284826. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources