Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):963.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05546-5.

Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study

Affiliations

Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study

Sibo Wang et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio (Cr/CysC) with long-term all-cause mortality and cause-specific (cardiovascular and cancer) mortality among US general adults.

Methods: This nationally representative cohort study included adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2004. Participants were linked to National Death Index data from the survey date through December 31, 2019. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and restricted cubic splines and stratified analyses were also performed.

Results: A total of 12,914 participants were included in this study (mean [SD] age, 45.3 [17.3] years; males, 48.9%). During a median follow-up of 17.9 years (maximum follow-up, 20.8 years), 3439 total deaths occurred, including 1098 cardiovascular deaths and 736 cancer deaths. Cumulative incidence curves revealed that increased Cr/CysC ratio had lower risk of all-cause (P < 0.001), cardiovascular (P < 0.001) and cancer (P < 0.001) mortality. Cox regression an Fine-Gray hazards models demonstrated that the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios comparing the highest vs. lowest quartile of Cr/CysC ratio were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.47; P < 0.001) for all-cause mortality, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52-0.88; P < 0.001) for cardiovascular mortality, and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.36-0.71; P < 0.001) for cancer mortality. Nonlinear association was observed for Cr/CysC ratio and all-cause mortality (P = 0.018 for nonlinearity), and linear associations were observed for Cr/CysC ratio and cardiovascular (P = 0.212 for nonlinearity) and cancer (P = 0.550 for nonlinearity) mortality. Besides, a series of sensitivity analyses ensured the robustness of the results.

Conclusions: In this cohort of US adults, Cr/CysC ratio was negatively associated with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. Our study suggests that Cr/CysC ratio may serve as a simple and effective predictor of long-term health outcomes.

Keywords: Creatinine-cystatin C ratio; Epidemiology; Mortality; Muscle mass; NHANES; Sarcopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The NHANES protocols were approved by the NCHS Research Ethics Review Board (Protocol #98 − 12) ( https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm ) and were consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki. Each participant signed the written informed consent. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves for all-cause mortality by quartiles categories of Cr/CysC ratio in adults. The P value was calculated with the use of the log-rank test
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hazard ratios (95% CIs) of Cr/CysC ratio with all-cause mortality using a restricted cubic spline regression model. Results were adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, family income-to-poverty ratio, history of hypertension, diabetes, CVD, cancer, smoking, alcohol drinking, BMI, LDL-C, HDL-C, CRP and eGFR (model 3). The solid blue line is multivariable adjusted hazard ratios, and the blue shadows represent the 95% CIs

References

    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA, Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393:2636–46. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31138-9. - PubMed
    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31. 10.1093/ageing/afy169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Hao Q, Ge M, Dong B. Association of Sarcopenia and fractures in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:1253–62. 10.1007/s00198-018-4429-5. - PubMed
    1. Peng TC, Chen WL, Wu LW, Chang YW, Kao TW. Sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:2695–701. 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.12.014. - PubMed
    1. Zhang H, Lin S, Gao T, Zhong F, Cai J, Sun Y, et al. Association between Sarcopenia and metabolic syndrome in Middle-aged and older non-obese adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10. 10.3390/nu10030364. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources