Patient safety and climate change: findings from a cross-sectional survey in Germany
- PMID: 39567901
- PMCID: PMC11580531
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20752-x
Patient safety and climate change: findings from a cross-sectional survey in Germany
Abstract
Background: Patient safety has become a priority issue in health policy strategies in Germany in the last several years, and is especially important in the era of climate change. This study aimed to assess public perceptions about the patient safety impact of climate change and the demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing patient perception in Germany.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Germany in 2023, using data from the TK Monitor of Patient Safety. The TK Monitor of Patient Safety is a national survey of the population on the state of safety in medical care. Self-reported data were collected from 1,000 randomly selected adults living in Germany. Demographic and socioeconomic variables were regressed on climate change perception using an ordinal logistic regression approach.
Results: Our results revealed that half of respondents are concerned about climate change affecting their health and 40% of the respondents would like to have climate-sensitive health counseling by their general practitioner. The results showed that demographic variables, such as gender and age, and socioeconomic variables, such as education level and income, are important factors influencing the perception of climate change-related patient safety risks. However, no association was found between urban/rural residence and patient perception.
Conclusions: Our study highlights patient safety as a public health concern in the era of climate change. The German public appears to view climate change as harmful to patient safety. Our findings also show that it is necessary to carry out diagnoses focused on demographic and socioeconomic factors to determine which aspects should be strengthened through programs aimed at reducing patient safety risks associated with climate change.
Keywords: Climate change; Patient safety; Public Health.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: General public survey studies are not required to undergo ethical review in Germany. Data were collected by the Society for Social Research and Statistical Analysis Ltd. (forsa) [19] that signed the international ethics code for public opinion research (ICC/ESOMAR Code). Participation in the study was voluntary and no expense allowance was paid. Participants were informed about the anonymity of the survey, the aims of the study, and data protection. They also gave their informed consent. The contact data and quotas were deleted immediately after the interviews, in accordance with data protection regulations. The forsa institute has accepted the code of ethics of the industry association [20]. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: DS, MG and BSM have received compensation for scientific advice as part of the questionnaire development from the statutory health fund ‘Techniker Krankenkasse’. HM was Secretary General of the German Coalition for Patient Safety until September 2019. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Knowledge and perception about climate change and human health: findings from a baseline survey among vulnerable communities in Bangladesh.BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 15;16:266. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2930-3. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26979241 Free PMC article.
-
Focus on patient perspectives in climate action policies for healthcare. A German survey analysis on what patients are willing to do.Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;12:1477313. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477313. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39659718 Free PMC article.
-
Climate-sensitive health counselling in Germany: a cross-sectional study about previous participation and preferences in the general public.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1519. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18998-6. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38844875 Free PMC article.
-
[Patient perspectives on patient safety: Results of a population-based survey in Germany].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Oct;165:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Aug 16. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021. PMID: 34412979 German.
-
[Public perception of climate change and implications for risk communication].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 May;62(5):612-619. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-02930-0. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019. PMID: 30923847 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Trends in public perceptions of patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a repeated cross-sectional survey in Germany, 2019-2023.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329761. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40763169 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO. Patient safety. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety. Accessed 7 Feb 2024.
-
- Sherman JD, MacNeill AJ, Biddinger PD, Ergun O, Salas RN, Eckelman MJ. Sustainable and Resilient Health Care in the Face of a Changing Climate. Annu Rev Public Health. 2023;44:255–77. - PubMed
-
- Slawomirski L, Klazinga N. The economics of patient safety: from analysis to action. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2020.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical