Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 14;16(11):e73705.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.73705. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Salman Tariq et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged as a promising class of medications for type 2 diabetes (T2D) management. While their glucose-lowering effects are well-established, their long-term impact on cardiovascular outcomes remains a subject of ongoing research and debate. This systematic review aims to assess the long-term cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 RAs in adults with T2D compared to placebo, standard care, or other glucose-lowering medications. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published from database inception to April 2024. Two independent reviewers screened the studies and extracted the data. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes included individual components of MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. We included 15 studies (eight RCTs and seven observational studies) involving over 180,000 participants. GLP-1 RAs were associated with a significant reduction in MACE compared to placebo or standard care (risk ratio: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.94, p<0.001). GLP-1 RAs also demonstrated superior cardiovascular protection compared to DPP-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas. The benefits were particularly pronounced in reducing the risk of stroke and MI. Notably, some studies found larger cardiovascular benefits in frail patients. The effects on heart failure outcomes were mixed, with potential attenuated benefits in patients with baseline heart failure. GLP-1 RAs also showed promising effects on renal outcomes and metabolic parameters. The quality of evidence ranged from moderate to high across outcomes. This systematic review provides strong evidence that GLP-1 RAs offer significant cardiovascular benefits in adults with T2D, particularly in reducing MACE, stroke, and MI. The findings support current guidelines recommending GLP-1 RAs as preferred agents in patients with established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. However, the variability in effects across different patient subgroups underscores the need for personalized treatment approaches. Future research should focus on head-to-head comparisons between different GLP-1 RAs, long-term follow-up studies, and investigation of combination therapies to further optimize the use of these agents in clinical practice.

Keywords: cardiorenal protection; cardiovascular outcomes; comparative effectiveness; diabetes management; glp-1 receptor agonists; major adverse cardiovascular events (mace); metabolic effects; patient subgroups; systematic review; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Prisma flow chart

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes - global burden of disease and forecasted trends. Khan MA, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al Kaabi J. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10:107–111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2023. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care. 2023;46:0–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:2669–2701. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology clinical practice guideline: developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan—2022 update. Blonde L, Umpierrez GE, Reddy SS, et al. Endocr Pract. 2022;28:923–1049. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Incretin hormones: their role in health and disease. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20 Suppl 1:5–21. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources