Availability and readiness of public health facilities to provide differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Zambia: implications for better treatment outcomes
- PMID: 39568605
- PMCID: PMC11576449
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1396590
Availability and readiness of public health facilities to provide differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Zambia: implications for better treatment outcomes
Abstract
Background: There is persistent pressure on countries with a high burden of HIV infection to reach desired targets for HIV treatment outcomes. This has led to moving from the "one-size-fits-all" model to differentiated service delivery (DSD) models, which are meant to be more patient-centered and efficient but without compromising on the quality of patient care. However, for DSD models to be efficient, facilities should have indicators of HIV services available and ready to provide the DSD models. We aimed to assess the availability of HIV service indicators and the readiness of facilities to provide DSD models for HIV treatment in selected public health facilities in Zambia.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey among public health facilities in Zambia that provide antiretroviral therapy (ART) services. We used an interviewer-administered questionnaire based on a World Health Organization (WHO) Service Availability Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool to assess the availability of HIV service indicators and the readiness of facilities to implement DSD models for HIV treatment. Availability and readiness were considered latent constructs, and therefore, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to determine the correlations between them and their respective indicators.
Results: Of 60 public health ART facilities, the overall availability of HIV service indicators was 80.0% (48/60), and readiness to provide the DSD models was 81.7% (48/60). However, only 48 and 39% of the facilities had all indicators of availability and readiness, respectively. Retention in care for HIV multidisciplinary teams was more likely to occur in urban areas than in rural areas. SEM showed that the standardized estimate between availability and readiness was significantly and positively correlated (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001). In addition, both availability and readiness were significantly and positively correlated with most of their respective indicators.
Conclusion: Although most facilities had available HIV service indicators and were ready to provide DSD models, most facilities did not have all indicators of availability and readiness. In addition, there were differences between rural and urban facilities in some indicators. There is a need for persistent and heightened efforts meant to implement DSD in HIV treatment, especially in rural areas to accelerate reaching the desired HIV treatment outcomes.
Keywords: HIV; Zambia; availability; differentiated service delivery; readiness.
Copyright © 2024 Kaonga, Sampa, Musukuma, Mulawa, Mulavu, Sitali, Moonga, Mweemba, Matenga, Zyambo, Hamoonga, Phiri, Halwindi, Chavula, Zulu and Jacobs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The SENTINEL study of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia: research protocol for a prospective cohort study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09813-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37612720 Free PMC article.
-
Availability and readiness of health facilities providing services for other infectious diseases to treat neglected tropical diseases in Ethiopia: implications for service integration in high burden areas.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 26;24(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11257-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39061057 Free PMC article.
-
Client and provider preferences for HIV care: Implications for implementing differentiated service delivery in Thailand.J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Apr;24(4):e25693. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25693. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021. PMID: 33792192 Free PMC article.
-
A Review of Differentiated Service Delivery for HIV Treatment: Effectiveness, Mechanisms, Targeting, and Scale.Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Aug;16(4):324-334. doi: 10.1007/s11904-019-00454-5. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019. PMID: 31230342 Review.
-
Retention in care and viral suppression in differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid systematic review.J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Nov;23(11):e25640. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25640. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020. PMID: 33247517 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ministry of Health of Zambia : Zambia Differentiated service delivery (DSD) framework (2022–2026).
-
- Luque-Fernandez MA, Van Cutsem G, Goemaere E, Hilderbrand K, Schomaker M, Mantangana N, et al. . Effectiveness of patient adherence groups as a model of care for stable patients on antiretroviral therapy in Khayelitsha, Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e56088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056088, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical