Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Nov;13(22):e70433.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.70433.

Patients Can Administer Mobile Audio Recordings to Increase Knowledge in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Patients Can Administer Mobile Audio Recordings to Increase Knowledge in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Daniel H Kwon et al. Cancer Med. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Consultation audio recordings improve patient decision-making but are underutilized. Patient-administered recording apps on mobile devices may increase access, but implementation has not been evaluated.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm study delivering education, coaching, and reminders for patients to record their appointment using a mobile recording app. Patients had progressive, advanced prostate cancer and an upcoming appointment where the option of docetaxel would be discussed. We used the RE-AIM framework for evaluation. Reach was the proportion of patients who participated. Effectiveness was change in informed decision-making pre- vs. post-appointment. We used a questionnaire evaluating patient knowledge about docetaxel (0%-100% correct) and the decisional conflict scale-informed subscale (0 = feels extremely uninformed to 100 = extremely informed) to compare means using the paired t-test. Adoption was the proportion of providers agreeing to be recorded. Implementation was coordinator adherence to intervention delivery. We conducted semistructured interviews with patients, caregivers, and providers to assess barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for recording implementation.

Results: Of 102 patients approached, 50 (49%) patients participated. Mean age was 75 years, 38 (76%) were Non-Hispanic White, and 43 (86%) had telehealth appointments. Knowledge increased from 44.7% to 49.5% (p = 0.019), particularly about palliative care (42% answering correctly to 60%, p = 0.035). Decisional conflict-informed subscale increased from 48.9 to 70.9 (p < 0.001). Forty-three patients (85%) made a recording, of whom 33 (77%) reported the recording helped treatment decision-making. All 17 providers agreed to be recorded. Coordinator adherence was high. Multi-level barriers, suggestions, and facilitators mostly related to intervention complexity and stakeholder compatibility.

Conclusion: Patient-administered audio recordings had a positive effect on decision-making, particularly for palliative care awareness. For broader implementation, efforts should focus on revising institutional policies; teaching patients or caregivers to use existing recording functions on their devices; leveraging artificial intelligence for transcription and summarization; and integrating recording into telehealth technology and electronic patient portals.

Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05127850.

Keywords: implementation science; palliative care; patient education; patient knowledge; prostate cancer; recordings; shared decision‐making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Sepucha reports grants to her institution from PCORI, AHRQ, and NIA outside the current project and consulting contract through her institution with Blue Cross Blue Shield Massachusetts outside current project.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Weighted scatter plot showing pre/post changes in informed decision‐making and total knowledge scores. Diagonals denote change in score. Numerals above the mid‐diagonal represent a positive change in score, and those below represent a negative change. (A) Overall, the mean knowledge score increased from 44.7% to 49.5% (p = 0.019). Two patients did not complete the post‐appointment survey and were excluded from analysis. In sensitivity analyses in which we indicated that the two patients responded either as the least effective or most effective response for other patients with their baseline knowledge score, the results were not significantly different. (B) Overall, the mean DCS informed scale increased from 48.9 to 70.9 (p < 0.001). Three patients did not complete the post‐appointment survey and were excluded from analysis. In sensitivity analyses in which we indicated that the three patients responded either as the least effective or most effective response for other patients with the same baseline DCS score, the results were not significantly different.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Pre/post changes in individual knowledge items. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.050). There were 19 individual items that comprised the knowledge questionnaire based on key facts a person should know when consider docetaxel as a treatment option in mCRPC. ARSI = androgen receptor signaling inhibitor. mCRPC = metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer.

References

    1. Committee on Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: Addressing the Challenges of an Aging Population, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine , Delivering High‐Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis, eds. Levit L., Balogh E., Nass S., and Ganz P. A. (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK202148/. - PubMed
    1. Katz S. J., Belkora J., and Elwyn G., “Shared Decision Making for Treatment of Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities,” Journal of Oncology Practice/ American Society of Clinical Oncology 10, no. 3 (2014): 206–208, 10.1200/JOP.2014.001434. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schroy P. C., Emmons K. M., Peters E., et al., “Aid‐Assisted Decision Making and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 43, no. 6 (2012): 573–583, 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunn S. M., Butow P. N., Tattersall M. H., et al., “General Information Tapes Inhibit Recall of the Cancer Consultation,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 11, no. 11 (1993): 2279–2285, 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansen J., Butow P. N., van Weert J. C. M., et al., “Does Age Really Matter? Recall of Information Presented to Newly Referred Patients With Cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 26, no. 33 (2008): 5450–5457, 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2322. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data