Implementation challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in primary care: Perspectives of general practitioners in London UK
- PMID: 39570873
- PMCID: PMC11581230
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314196
Implementation challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in primary care: Perspectives of general practitioners in London UK
Abstract
Introduction: Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly in primary care settings, raises crucial questions about practical challenges and opportunities. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) on the impact of AI in primary care.
Methods: A convenience sampling method was employed, involving a hybrid workshop with 12 GPs and 4 GP registrars. Verbal consent was obtained, and the workshop was audio recorded. Thematic analysis was conducted on the recorded data and contemporaneous notes to identify key themes.
Results: The workshop took place in 2023 and included 16 GPs aged 30 to 72 of diverse backgrounds and expertise. Most (93%) were female, and five (31%) self-identified as ethnic minorities. Thematic analysis identified two key themes related to AI in primary care: the potential benefits (such as help with diagnosis and risk assessment) and the associated concerns and challenges. Sub-themes included anxieties about diagnostic accuracy, AI errors, industry influence, and overcoming integration resistance. GPs also worried about increased workload, particularly extra, unnecessary patient tests, the lack of evidence base for AI programmes or accountability of AI systems and appropriateness of AI algorithms for different population groups. Participants emphasised the importance of transparency, trust-building, and research rigour to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AI systems in healthcare.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that GPs recognise the potential of AI in primary care but raise important concerns regarding evidence base, accountability, bias and workload. The participants emphasised the need for rigorous evaluation of AI technologies. Further research and collaboration between healthcare professionals, policymakers, and technology organisations are essential to navigating these challenges and harnessing the full potential of AI.
Copyright: © 2024 Razai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
The Perceptions of Potential Prerequisites for Artificial Intelligence in Danish General Practice: Vignette-Based Interview Study Among General Practitioners.JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Mar 12;13:e63895. doi: 10.2196/63895. JMIR Med Inform. 2025. PMID: 40072916 Free PMC article.
-
Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1695-1704. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa131. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32845984 Free PMC article.
-
General Practitioners' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Systems: Interview Study.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e28916. doi: 10.2196/28916. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35084342 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on artificial intelligence in patient care: a systematic review of hindering and facilitating factors on different levels.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 1;25(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12664-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40312413 Free PMC article.
-
Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43262. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37692617 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Valuable insights into general practice staff's experiences and perspectives on AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening-An interview study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 11;12:1565532. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1565532. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40134918 Free PMC article.
-
The low-carbon fruit tree for primary care.Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Jul;38(4):331-338. doi: 10.1177/08404704251333639. Epub 2025 May 14. Healthc Manage Forum. 2025. PMID: 40369943 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Use of an Artificial Intelligence Platform OpenEvidence to Augment Clinical Decision-Making for Primary Care Physicians.J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251332215. doi: 10.1177/21501319251332215. Epub 2025 Apr 16. J Prim Care Community Health. 2025. PMID: 40238861 Free PMC article.
-
Transforming GP training in the UK: the lasting impact of COVID-19 on telehealth and hybrid care models.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 4;12:1595937. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1595937. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40534688 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Death risk prediction model for patients with non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02865-4. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025. PMID: 39844133 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kumar P, Sharma SK, Dutot V. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CRM capability in healthcare: The impact on service innovation. International Journal of Information Management. 2023;69:102598.
-
- Industrial Strategy: building a Britain fit for the future, Department for Business, Energy and Industry Strategy, Policy Paper. 2017.
-
- Yu Z, Nguyen J, Nguyen TD, Kelly J, Mclean C, Bonnington P, et al.. Early melanoma diagnosis with sequential dermoscopic images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2021;41(3):633–46. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources