Ibrutinib With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma
- PMID: 39572395
- DOI: 10.1002/hon.70001
Ibrutinib With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma
Abstract
Therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aB-NHL) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or in elderly patients can be challenging. In this single-center, single-arm, phase II clinical study, we investigated the efficacy of ibrutinib (560 mg once daily) in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (IBR) given for six 28-day cycles in their standard dose, to patients with R/R aB-NHL who were either transplant ineligible in first or second relapse or post-ASCT for second relapse. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Fifty-six patients (54% male, median age 69.7 years) were included. ORR was 49.1% among 55 patients treated with ≥ 1 cycle of IBR and 69.4% among 36 patients treated with ≥ 3 cycles. Patients with relapsed disease had significantly higher ORR compared to those with refractory disease (72.3% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.024). Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (95% CI, 7.1-22.3) and median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI, 2.5-7.4). Patients with complete and partial responses had significantly longer median OS compared to those with stable and progressive disease (28.1 vs. 5.2 months, p < 0.0001). Adverse events included thrombocytopenia (19.6%), anemia (16.1%), neutropenia (7.1%), fatigue (35.7%), diarrhea (28.6%) and nausea (28.6%). At the first efficacy evaluation 8 patients were referred to transplantation, and 3 more were referred during follow-up. These data indicate that the IBR regimen is a safe and effective treatment option that can also be used for bridging to transplantation in patients with R/R aB-NHL.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02747732.
Keywords: aggressive B‐cell lymphoma; elderly; ibrutinib bendamustine and rituximab; refractory disease; relapsed disease.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- J. W. Said, “Aggressive B‐Cell Lymphomas: How Many Categories Do We Need?,” supplement, Modern Pathology 26, no. S1 (2013): S42–S56, https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.178.
-
- C. Gisselbrecht, B. Glass, N. Mounier, et al., “Salvage Regimens With Autologous Transplantation for Relapsed Large B‐Cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 28, no. 27 (2010): 4184–4190, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.28.1618.
-
- M. Kamdar, S. R. Solomon, J. E. Arnason, et al., “Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (Liso‐cel), a CD19‐Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy, Versus Standard of Care (SOC) With Salvage Chemotherapy (CT) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) as Second‐Line (2L) Treatment in Patients (Pts) With Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Large B‐Cell Lymphoma (LBCL): Results From the Randomized Phase 3 Transform Study,” supplement, Blood 138, no. S1 (2021): 91, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood‐2021‐147913.
-
- F. L. Locke, D. B. Miklos, C. A. Jacobson, et al., “Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second‐Line Therapy for Large B‐Cell Lymphoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 386, no. 7 (2022): 640–654, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2116133.
-
- A. Lopez, A. Gutierrez, A. Palacios, et al., “GEMOX‐R Regimen Is a Highly Effective Salvage Regimen in Patients With Refractory/Relapsing Diffuse Large‐Cell Lymphoma: A Phase II Study,” European Journal of Haematology 80, no. 2 (2008): 127–132, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0609.2007.00996.x.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical