Gastrectomies for the treatment of gastric cancer in a reference cancer center present better pathological results and survival compared to non-specialized hospitals
- PMID: 39572909
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.27746
Gastrectomies for the treatment of gastric cancer in a reference cancer center present better pathological results and survival compared to non-specialized hospitals
Abstract
Background: Some studies have shown that gastrectomy performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume specialized hospitals with the possibility of complete treatment has better results. This study aimed to compare the results of patients who underwent surgery at a reference center with non-specialized centers.
Methods: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma stage as pTNM II and III who underwent curative gastrectomy and were referred for adjuvant chemotherapy between 2009 and 2018 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: patients operated on in a reference center with complete oncological treatment (Reference Group); and those operated on in an external Hospital and referred for adjuvant treatment at the reference center (External Group).
Results: A total of 643 patients were evaluated, 307 in the external group and 336 in the reference group. Patients in the external group were younger (58.9 vs. 62.6 years; p < 0.001) and with fewer comorbidities according to the Charlson-Deyo index (p < 0.001). The pathological result showed more dissected lymph nodes (41.4 vs. 23.5; p < 0.001) and a higher R0 resection rate (98.5% vs. 95.1%; p = 0.013) in the reference group. Patients of the external group underwent more adjuvant radiotherapy (49.5% vs. 33.9%; p < 0.001) with no difference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.066). Peritoneal recurrence was more common in the external group (63.2% vs 38.7%, p < 0.001). The disease-free survival rate was higher in the reference group (p < 0.001) as well as overall survival (p = 0.01).
Conclusion: Patients who received full oncological treatment at a reference center had better survival outcomes compared to those operated in external services.
Keywords: centralized hospital services; gastrectomy; gastric cancer; high volume hospitals; outcome assessment.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209‐249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
-
- Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11‐20.
-
- Song Y, Shannon AB, Concors SJ, et al. Are volume pledge standards worth the travel burden for major abdominal cancer operations? Ann Surg. 2022;275(6):e743‐e751. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004361
-
- Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364‐1369. doi:10.1056/nejm197912203012503
-
- de Geus SW, Papageorge MV, Woods AP, et al. A rising tide lifts all boats: impact of combined volume of complex cancer operations on surgical outcomes in a low‐volume setting. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234(6):981‐988. doi:10.1097/xcs.0000000000000228
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical