Swimmer arm-to-shoulder test for early differentiation between shoulder and cervical spine pathology in patients with shoulder pain
- PMID: 39574084
- PMCID: PMC11580640
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08013-9
Swimmer arm-to-shoulder test for early differentiation between shoulder and cervical spine pathology in patients with shoulder pain
Abstract
Background: Several tests have been suggested for screening and diagnosis of cervical spine and shoulder girdle conditions underlying shoulder pain with variable degrees of clinical accuracy. The present study aimed to test the reliability, clinical benefit and screening value of the Swimmer Arm-to-Shoulder (SAS) test; a new clinical test developed to differentiate shoulder impingement from cervical radiculopathy in patients with shoulder pain of ≤ 12 weeks.
Methods: The study included 718 patients aged 40-65 years, with unilateral and localized shoulder girdle pain lasting for ≤ 12 weeks. Diagnosis based on clinical, electromyography and radiological findings was considered as the reference gold standard for test assessment.
Results: Clinical diagnosis identified shoulder pathology in 288 patients (40.1%) and cervical spine pathology in 430 patients (59.9%). SAS test was positive in 274 patients (38.2%). The SAS test proved to be effective in distinguishing shoulder from cervical spine pathology with a sensitivity of 89.2% (95% CI: 85.0-92.6%), specificity of 96.1% (95% CI: 93.8-97.7%), PPV of 93.8% (95% CI: 90.5-96.0%), NPV of 93.0% (95% CI: 90.5-94.9%), LR + of 22.6% (95% CI: 14.1-36.0%), LR- of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08-0.16) and accuracy of 93.3% (95% CI: 91.2-95.0%).
Conclusions: SAS test is an easy to perform, patient dependent and reliable as a screening test and diagnosis confirmatory test.
Keywords: Cervical spine; Provocative tests; Shoulder impingement; Shoulder pain.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Protocol of the present study was approved by the ethical committee of Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine and all participants provided informed consent in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration on clinical research involving human subjects. Consent for publication: NA. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Maxwell C, Robinson K, McCreesh K. Understanding shoulder pain: a qualitative evidence synthesis exploring the patient experience. Phys Ther. 2021;101(3): pzaa229. - PubMed
-
- Noten S, Struyf F, Lluch E, et al. Central Pain Processing in patients with Shoulder Pain: a review of the literature. Pain Pract. 2017;17(2):267–80. - PubMed
-
- Pateder DB, Berg JH, Thal R. Neck and shoulder pain: differentiating cervical spine pathology from shoulder pathology. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2009;18(4):170–4 Winter. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
