Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 22;16(10):e72106.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.72106. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Cardiac Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights Into Pathophysiology, Classification, and Hemodynamic Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Cardiac Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights Into Pathophysiology, Classification, and Hemodynamic Assessment

Stavroula A Siopi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Heart failure is defined as increased intracardiac pressures, either alone or combined with reduced cardiac output. Clinically, it is presented with signs and symptoms of congestion and compensated perfusion. Cardiogenic shock, on the other hand, is the spectrum of hemodynamic disturbances that lead to hypoperfusion or need for circulatory support, due to cardiac disease. Both entities affect millions of people worldwide, have a dismal prognosis, and constitute a severe socioeconomic burden. Heart failure can be the aftermath of ischemic heart disease, hypertension, arrhythmias, or cardiomyopathies. It undergoes multiple classifications, facilitating its investigation and treatment. The pathogenetic mechanisms differ in various types of heart failure, regarding the affected ventricles, the duration of symptoms, and their primary/secondary onset. These mechanisms reflect the complex interactions between cardiopulmonary, vascular, and hepatorenal systems. Acute deterioration of cardiac function can lead to cardiogenic shock. Myocardial infarction accounts for 81% of such cases. Healthy lifestyle and timely management of coronary artery disease are paramount, as they can prevent this life-threatening situation and reduce mortality and the economic burden for healthcare systems. Irrespective of the etiology, cardiogenic shock is interpreted using the pressure-volume loop. This can be modified for each ventricle, the underlying pathophysiology, and the time since symptoms' onset. It therefore provides valuable information about the native circulation and the expected alterations under mechanical or pharmacological support, facilitating the decision-making progress. In 2019, given the phenotypical heterogeneity of cardiogenic shock, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions introduced a classification system. According to this, patients are stratified in five stages proportionally to the severity of their condition. Aside from this classification, various biochemical, imaging, and hemodynamic monitoring indices are used to assess coagulation pathway and cardiac, hepatorenal, and pulmonary function, enabling the heart team to tailor therapy. Additionally, the prognostication progress is facilitated by scores, such as the Observatoire Regional Breton sur l'Infarctus (ORBI) score, the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) SHOCK-II score, and the CardShock score, indicating suitable escalation or de-escalation strategies. Despite the current progress, there are several areas of advancement regarding the role of vasoactive drugs in cardiogenic shock, revascularization options, mechanical ventilation patterns, hypothermia treatment, and mechanical circulatory support protocols.

Keywords: acute heart failure; cardiogenic shock; hemodynamics; left heart failure; pressure-volume loop; right heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pressure-volume loops and relations in normal cardiac function
Reference: [73]; reprinted with permission Ea: arterial elastance; EDPVR: end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; EDV: end-diastolic volume; Ees: end-systolic elastance; ESPVR: end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; ESV: end-systolic volume; HR: heart rate; LV: left ventricular; TPR: total peripheral resistance
Figure 2
Figure 2. LV pressure-volume loop in normal cardiac function (A) in comparison to the acute phase of myocardial infarction (B) and to CS (C)
Reference: [74]; reprinted with permission LV: left ventricular; Ea: arterial elastance; Emax: maximal elastance; LVEDP: left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVSP: left ventricular systolic pressure; SV: stroke volume; CS: cardiogenic shock
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pressure-volume loop of the RV in normal cardiac function
Reference: [82]; reprinted with permission Ea: arterial elastance; EDPVR: end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; Ees: end-systolic elastance; ESPVR: end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; RV: right ventricular; RVEDP: right ventricular end-diastolic pressure; RVESP: right ventricular end-systolic pressure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3599–3726. - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. Ziaeian B, Fonarow GC. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:368–378. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The pathophysiology of heart failure. Kemp CD, Conte JV. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012;21:365–371. - PubMed
    1. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2022;75:523. - PubMed
    1. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Circulation. 2017;136:0–68. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources