Radiation Exposure and Protection for (Assumed) Pregnant Interventional Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists
- PMID: 39575215
- PMCID: PMC11576368
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102239
Radiation Exposure and Protection for (Assumed) Pregnant Interventional Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists
Abstract
Background: Concern about fetus radiation dose and assumed health effects remains a barrier for women considering a career in invasive cardiology. However, there is a lack of real-world fetus exposure data that can be used to support career decisions. The purpose of this work was to measure radiation exposure to invasive cardiologists which would contribute to dose to the fetus during pregnancy.
Methods: Radiation exposure to 42 female and male interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists was monitored during their clinical routine. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the influences of patient radiation exposure, radioprotective garment material thickness (0.25, 0.35, 0.5 mm Pb equivalent), and cardiologist sex, height, and clinical role on occupational radiation exposure to the abdomen.
Results: Exposure to the abdomen of invasive cardiologists increased proportional to patient exposure and decreased predictably with increasing radioprotective material thickness. The median abdomen exposure when covered with a 0.5 mm Pb equivalent radioprotective material over a 40-week period was 0.22 mGy (95th percentile, 0.8 mGy). Physician sex, height, and clinical role did not influence occupational exposure.
Conclusions: The use of a 0.5 mm Pb equivalent radioprotective garment covering the abdomen, combined with appropriate radiation safety practices, can ensure that fetus radiation dose is below both US and international limits. Assumed fetus risk due to very low occupational radiation exposure is likely inconsequential in light of other known pregnancy risks.
Keywords: fetus radiation exposure; occupational health; pregnancy; radiation safety.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Figures



Similar articles
-
SCAI consensus document on occupational radiation exposure to the pregnant cardiologist and technical personnel.EuroIntervention. 2011 Feb;6(7):866-74. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I7A148. EuroIntervention. 2011. PMID: 21252022 Review.
-
SCAI consensus document on occupational radiation exposure to the pregnant cardiologist and technical personnel.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb 1;77(2):232-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22877. Epub 2011 Jan 28. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 21061249
-
[Protection against ionizing radiation by leaded glass googles during interventional cardiology].Rev Med Chil. 2013 Jan;141(1):63-9. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872013000100009. Rev Med Chil. 2013. PMID: 23732416 Spanish.
-
Radiation Exposure to the Pregnant Interventional Cardiologist. Does It Really Pose a Risk to the Fetus?Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Jul;70(7):606-608. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.11.037. Epub 2017 Feb 15. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017. PMID: 28214247 English, Spanish. No abstract available.
-
SCAI consensus document on occupational radiation exposure to the pregnant cardiologist and technical personnel.Heart Lung Circ. 2011 Feb;20(2):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.11.006. Heart Lung Circ. 2011. PMID: 21241961 Review.
Cited by
-
Occupational Health Hazards in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Results of the 2023 SCAI Survey.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 4;4(4):102493. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102493. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025. PMID: 40308248 Free PMC article.
-
Radiation safety in catheter ablation: clinical value of real-time operator dosimetry.Heart Vessels. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02567-x. Online ahead of print. Heart Vessels. 2025. PMID: 40549146
References
-
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 116 – Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation. 1993. https://ncrponline.org/shop/reports/report-no-116-limitation-of-exposure...
-
- ICRP The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4) - PubMed
-
- Writing Committee Members. Hirshfeld JW Jr, Ferrari V.A., et al. 2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT expert consensus document on optimal use of ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging: best practices for safety and effectiveness. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92(2):E35–E97. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27659. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources