Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Feb 3;31(3):529-542.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1591.

Safety and Tolerability of Letetresgene Autoleucel (GSK3377794): Pilot Studies in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety and Tolerability of Letetresgene Autoleucel (GSK3377794): Pilot Studies in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Mehmet Altan et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor response of letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel), genetically modified autologous T cells expressing a T-cell receptor specific for New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1)/LAGE-1a shared epitope, alone or in combination with pembrolizumab, in HLA-A*02-positive (HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*02:05, and/or HLA-A*02:06) patients with NY-ESO-1- and/or LAGE-1a-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Patients and methods: Study 208749 was a single-arm study of lete-cel alone. Study 208471 was a multiarm study of lete-cel alone or in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.

Results: More than 2,500 patients were screened for target expression. In the multiarm study, 738 (45%) of 1,638 tested patients were HLA-A*02-positive. NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a testing was positive in 12% (62/525) and 4% (15/348) of tested patients, respectively. Forty-one patients positive for HLA-A*02 and antigen expression were screened in the single-arm study. Overall, 43 patients underwent leukapheresis and 18 received lete-cel across studies. Lete-cel demonstrated a manageable safety profile. No fatal treatment-related serious adverse events (AE) were reported in either study. Cytopenias and cytokine release syndrome were the most common treatment-emergent AEs. Combining pembrolizumab with lete-cel did not seem to increase toxicity over lete-cel alone. Limited antitumor activity was observed; one of 18 patients had a durable response persisting for 18 months. Pharmacokinetic data showed similar T-cell expansion in all patients.

Conclusions: Extensive HLA-A*02 and antigen expression testing was performed to identify potential participants. Lete-cel was generally well tolerated and had no unexpected AEs. Antitumor activity was observed in a limited number of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M. Altan reports research funding (to institution) from GSK, Genentech, Nektar Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Jounce Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Adaptimmune, Shattuck Labs, and Gilead; serving on the advisory board of GSK, Shattuck Labs, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Insightec; receiving speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Nektar Therapeutics, and Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer; and being a member of the safety review committee for Nanobiotix-MDA alliance and Hengenix. G. Lopes reports grants from GSK during the conduct of the study; stock and other ownership interests in Lucence Diagnostics, Xilis, Biomab, MorphoMetriX and CDR-Life; honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint Medicines, AstraZeneca, Merck, and Janssen; consulting for Pfizer and AstraZeneca; research funding from AstraZeneca, Lucence, Xilis, E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme, EMD Serono, Blueprint Medicines, TESARO, Bavarian Nordic, Novartis, G1 Therapeutics, Adaptimmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, AbbVie, Rgenix, Pfizer, Roche, Genentech, Eli Lilly and Company, and Janssen; and fees for travel, accommodations, and expenses from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, E.R. Squibb Sons, & LLC, Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Ipsen, Pharmacyclics, Merck, and AstraZeneca. T.J.N. Hiltermann reports grants from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. L.C. Villaruz reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, EMD Serono, Sanofi, Gilead Sciences, and Daiichi Sankyo outside the submitted work. E. Calvo reports employment with START and HM Hospitales Group; leadership roles in START, PharmaMar, EORTC, Sanofi, BeiGene, Novartis, and Merus N.V.; being a stockholder in START and Oncoart Associated; receiving honoraria from HM Hospitales Group; acting as a consultant/advisor for Nanobiotix, Janssen-Cilag, Roche/Genentech, TargImmune Therapeutics, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amunix, Adcendo, Anaveon, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MonTa, MSD Oncology, Nouscom, Novartis, OncoDNA, T-knife, Elevation Oncology, PharmaMar, Ellipses Pharma, Syneos Health, Genmab, and Diaccurate; and research funding from START. M.J. Edelman reports grants from Stand Up To Cancer, Department of Defense, and NCI; consulting for BioAlta, GE Healthcare, InterVenn, Novocure, touchONCOLOGY, Sanofi, Omega Therapeutics, and Regeneron; meetings/travel for International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer; advisory board membership for AstraZeneca, AnHeart Therapeutics, Takeda, Duke/Hoosier Oncology Group, and GSK; leadership roles, including co-chair, lung committee, NRG, and deputy editor, lung cancer chair, scientific and advisory board; and being a stockholder in Creatv BIO and BioMarker Strategies. M. Furqan reports institutional research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Aprea, AstraZeneca, Astellas, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Checkmate, Elicio, Genmab, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Immunocore, Incyte, Jacobio, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Mirati, Novartis, and Pfizer; a consultant role with Omega Therapeutics and Novartis; and advisory board membership for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene, and Mirati. J. Neal reports honoraria from CME Matters, Clinical Care Options, Research to Practice, Medscape, Biomedical Learning Institute, MLI PeerView, prIME Oncology, Projects In Knowledge, Rockpointe, MJH Life Sciences, The Medical Educator Consortium, and HMP Education; a consulting role with AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Exelixis, Takeda, Eli Lilly and Company, Amgen, Iovance, Blueprint, Regeneron, Natera, Sanofi/Regeneron, D2G Oncology, Surface Oncology, Turning Point Therapeutics, Mirati Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Summit Therapeutics, Novartis, Novocure, Janssen Oncology, and AnHeart Therapeutics; research funding from Genentech/Roche, Merck, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Exelixis, Nektar Therapeutics, Takeda, Adaptimmune, GSK, Janssen, AbbVie, and Novocure; and royalties from UpToDate. E. Felip reports honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and touchONCOLOGY. J.W. Carlisle reports consulting for Amgen, Novocure, and Catalyst, as well as research funding (to institution) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, HUTCHMED, and Parexel. J.V. Heymach reports consulting for GSK, Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Regeneron, and EMD Serono, as well as advisory board membership for GSK, Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Regeneron, and EMD Serono. R.E. O'Cearbhail reports being supported in part by the NCI/NIH P30 CA008748 institutional grant; personal fees from Bayer, Curio, ImmunoGen, MJH/OncLive, Regeneron, Seattle Genetics/Seagen, TESARO/GSK, Miltenyi Biotec, 2seventy bio, and Loxo; fees for travel from Gathering Around Cancer, Ireland, outside the submitted work; a board advisory role for GSK; committee membership for PRIMA, Moonstone (TESARO/GSK), DUO-O (AstraZeneca), and ARTISTRY-7 (Mural Oncology) studies; an advisor for Carina Biotech; and funding from AbbVie/Stemcentrx, Atara Biotherapeutics, Bayer/Celgene/Juno, Context Therapeutics, Genentech, Genmab/Seagen Therapeutics, Gynecologic Oncology Foundation, Kite Pharma, Ludwig Cancer Institute, Marker Therapeutics, Merck, Regeneron, SELLAS Therapeutics, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, TCR2 Therapeutics, Lyell Therapeutics, Arsenal Bio, and TESARO/GSK. M. Zauderer reports being supported in part by the NCI/NIH P30 CA008748 institutional grant; grants from Vivace, MedImmune, Precog, GSK, Epizyme, Polaris, SELLAS Life Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Millenium, Curis, and Atara; consulting for Curis and Ikena; honoraria from PER and Medscape; and a leadership role in the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, as chair, board of the directors. M. Chisamore reports other support from Merck & Co. Inc. outside the submitted work, as well as reports employment with and ownership of stock in Merck & Co. Inc. E. Corigliano reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. I. Eleftheriadou reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. S. Zajic reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. B. Jenkins reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. S. Goodison reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. S. Suchindran reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. N. Ramos-Hernandez reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. N. Tarek reports employment with GSK and holding financial equities in GSK. A.J. Schoenfeld reports personal fees from Johnson & Johnson, KSQ Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Enara Bio, Perceptive Advisors, Oppenheimer and Co., Umoja Biopharma, Legend Biotech, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Obsidian Therapeutics, Prelude Therapeutics, Immunocore, Lyell Immunopharma, Amgen, and Heat Biologics, as well as grants (to institution) from GSK, PACT Pharma, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Achilles Therapeutics, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Harpoon Therapeutics, Affini-T Therapeutics, Legend Therapeutics, and Amgen outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient attrition and NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a expression profiles in the multiarm study. A, Patient attrition for multiarm study. A total of 1,698 patients in the multiarm study were screened and signed the informed consent form. Out of 13 dosed patients, six withdrew prior to meeting interventional phase completion criteria, per protocol. B, NY-ESO-1 IHC P-score distribution of screened NY-ESO-1–positive patients in the multiarm study. NY-ESO-1–positive protein expression was detected as a continuous variable with distribution between 10% and 100% expression. There were 62 patients whose tumors expressed NY-ESO-1 with a P score of ≥10%, 1+, 2+, and 3+, with each vertical bar representing a unique tumor sample depicted by contributing IHC intensity of 0+ in blue, 1+ in light blue, 2+ in light orange, and 3+ in orange (425 patients whose tumors expressed NY-ESO-1 <10%, 1+, 2+, and 3+ are not displayed). One patient (ID #61 in the figure) had two samples. C, NY-ESO-1 expression profile of dosed NY-ESO-1–positive patients in the multiarm study. The mITT population based on NY-ESO-1 IHC expression is individually represented in the vertical bars with the P-score broken down by contributing IHC intensity of 0+ in blue, 1+ in light blue, 2+ in light orange, and 3+ in orange. The patients are ordered by P score, which is indicated by the red line. NY-ESO-1–negative, LAGE-1a–positive patients in the mITT population not shown. D, LAGE-1a RNA expression distribution of all tested patients in the multiarm study. The plot of patients tested for LAGE-1a RT-PCR RNA expression, in which the red line indicates the cutoff = 4 ΔCT, with positive cases depicted in red and negative cases depicted in blue. Triangles represent all patients screened. The two patients dosed who were LAGE-1a–positive are distinguished in the figure with a red circle. Patients with “no expression” were imputed as having the lowest observable value divided by 3. The vertical axis is reversed (zero is higher); lower LAGE-1a score measured by RT-PCR represents higher expression levels. E, NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a prevalence. This is a bar chart displaying NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a prevalence. LAGE-1a testing was performed on tissue samples in reflex to NY-ESO-1–negative status for when tissue was available. Prevalence includes unique samples from the same patient. NE, not evaluable.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient tumor responses in the single- and multiarm studies. A, Best overall response in the single- and multiarm studies (confirmed). In the single-arm study, data following first infusion only. One patient did not have measurable target lesions at baseline and does not appear in this plot; one patient received a transduced cell dose below the required dose level, per protocol, due to waiver granted. In the multiarm study, *arm A: one patient (M65) had unconfirmed PR. **Arm C: one patient (M1) had unequivocal progression due to new lesion and one patient died prior to first post-treatment scan and does not appear in this plot. B, Percent change from baseline in target lesion diameter in the multiarm study. Arm A patients are shown at left, and arm C is shown at right. Red circles indicate new target lesions. C, Median PFS and OS for each study. D, Radiographic images of case study patient S5, single-arm study. One patient from the single-arm study (S5) received two separate infusions, achieving best overall responses of confirmed PR from first infusion and SD from the second, per RECIST 1.1. The top left image is baseline before the first infusion, and top right is after 9 months. The bottom left image is baseline before the second infusion, and the bottom right is at week 11 after second infusion. E, Peak persistence and tumor shrinkage of case study patient S5, single-arm study. CR, complete response; LLOD, lower limit of detection; NA, not available; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cellular kinetics profile by patient in the single- and multiarm studies. A, Single-arm study. Cellular kinetics profile at first infusion by patient and responder status truncated at 12 weeks (available data), mITT population. B, Multiarm study. Cellular kinetics profile by patient and treatment arm truncated at 6 months (first infusion), mITT population. AUC0–28 days, AUC from 0 to 28 days.

Comment in

References

    1. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1823–33. - PubMed
    1. Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, Reinmuth N, Vergnenegre A, Barrios CH, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1328–39. - PubMed
    1. Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2078–92. - PubMed
    1. Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, Zurawski B, Kim S-W, Carcereny Costa E, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381:2020–31. - PubMed
    1. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Orlandi F, Stroyakovskiy D, Nogami N, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2288–301. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms