Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;9(12):103990.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103990. Epub 2024 Nov 21.

Collagen signature adds prognostically significant information to staging for breast cancer

Affiliations

Collagen signature adds prognostically significant information to staging for breast cancer

Z Li et al. ESMO Open. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Tumor-associated collagen signature (TACS) is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. However, it is unclear whether the complete collagen signature, including TACS, the TACS-based collagen microscopic features (TCMF1), and the TACS-based nuclear features (TCMF2), can provide additional prognostic information for the current tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system.

Patients and methods: We included 941 patients with breast cancer from three cohorts: the training (n = 355), internal (n = 334), and external validation cohorts (n = 252). TACS and TCMF1 were obtained by multiphoton microscopy (MPM). TCMF2 was extracted on the hematoxylin and eosin images colocated with MPM images. They were linearly combined to establish a complete collagen signature score for reclassifying current TNM staging into stage Ⅰ (II and Ⅲ)/low risk and stage Ⅰ (II and Ⅲ)/high risk.

Results: The low-risk collagen signatures 'downstaged' patients in stage II or Ⅲ, while the high-risk collagen signatures 'upstaged' patients with stage Ⅰ tumors. After incorporating the complete collagen signature into the current TNM staging system, the modified staging system had a higher ability to stratify patients [referent, Ⅰ-new; Ⅱ-new, hazard ratio (HR) 8.655, 6.136, and 4.699 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively; Ⅲ-new, HR 14.855, 11.201, and 13.245 in the corresponding three cohorts, respectively] than the current TNM staging system (referent, Ⅰ; Ⅱ, HR 1.642, 1.853, and 1.371 in the corresponding three cohorts, respectively; Ⅲ, HR 4.131, 4.283, and 3.711 in the corresponding three cohorts, respectively). Furthermore, the modified staging system showed a higher area under the curve than the current TNM staging system (training cohort: 0.843 versus 0.683; internal validation cohort: 0.792 versus 0.661; and external validation cohort: 0.793 versus 0.646).

Conclusions: The complete collagen signature is an independent predictor of survival outcomes in breast cancer. It adds significant information about the biological behavior of the disease to staging for breast cancer.

Keywords: TNM staging; breast cancer; collagen signature; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predictive ability of the complete collagen signature for survival outcomes. (A) Receiver operating characteristic curves of the complete collagen signature predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in three cohorts. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves according to the complete collagen signature score in three cohorts. The values in brackets indicate 95% CI. AUC, area under the curve; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The impact of complete collagen signature on the current tumor–node–metastasis staging system in the training cohort.P values were calculated using the log-rank test. Red letters indicate that P values are significant (P < 0.05). DFS, disease-free survival
Figure 3
Figure 3
Decision analysis curves for the current tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system and the modified staging system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. - PubMed
    1. Singletary S.E., Allred C., Ashley P., et al. Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(4):803–819. - PubMed
    1. Weiss A., King T.A., Hunt K.K., et al. Incorporating biologic factors into the American Joint Committee on Cancer breast cancer staging system: review of the supporting evidence. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98(4):687–702. - PubMed
    1. Cserni G., Chmielik E., Cserni B., et al. The new TNM-based staging of breast cancer. Virchows Arch. 2018;472(5):697–703. - PubMed
    1. He J., Tsang J.Y., Xu X., et al. AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging provides no better discriminatory ability in prognosis than anatomical staging in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):18. - PMC - PubMed