Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Nov 22;22(1):551.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03764-7.

Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eric K C Wong et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Geriatric rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary intervention that promotes functional recovery in older adults. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and geriatric day hospital settings.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, PEDro and AgeLine from inception to September 30, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including older adults (age ≥ 65 years) undergoing geriatric rehabilitation (inpatient or day hospital) with a usual care comparator group. Primary outcome measures included mortality, long-term care home (LTCH) admission, and functional status. Secondary outcomes included discharge/remaining at home, functional improvement, length of stay, cognition, mood, and quality of life. Records were screened, abstracted and assessed for risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias [RoB] 2) by two reviewers independently. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis to summarize risk ratios (RR, dichotomous outcomes) and standardized mean differences (SMD, continuous outcomes).

Results: Of the 5304 records screened, 29 studies (7999 patients) met eligibility criteria. There were 23 RCTs of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (6428 patients) and six of geriatric day hospital (1571 patients) reporting outcomes of mortality (26 studies), LTCH admission (22 studies), functional status (19 studies), length of stay (18 studies), cognition (5 studies), mood (5 studies) and quality of life (6 studies). The primary outcome of mortality at longest follow up was lower in the rehabilitation group (RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.93, I2 = 0%). LTCH admission was lower in the rehabilitation group at longest follow up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.98, I2 = 8%). Functional status was better in the rehabilitation group at longest follow up (SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16, I2 = 24%). Cognition was improved in the rehabilitation group (mean difference of mini-mental status exam score 0.97, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.60, I2 = 0%). No difference was found for patient length of stay, mood, or quality of life.

Conclusions: Geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings reduced mortality, LTCH admission, and functional impairment. Future studies should explore implementation of this intervention for older adults.

Review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022345078.

Keywords: Cognition; Day hospital; Functional status; Geriatric rehabilitation; Inpatient; Long-term care; Mortality; Older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Weighted bar plots of risk-of-bias judgements within each bias domain and (b) traffic light plot of risk of bias domain judgements for each included study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Funnel plot of functional status at longest follow up
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mortality at longest follow up
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
LTCH admission at longest follow up
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Subgroup analysis for LTCH admission at longest follow up: follow up ≤ 6 months vs. > 6 months
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Subgroup analysis for LTCH admission at longest follow up: mean age < 80 vs. ≥ 80 years
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Functional status at longest follow up
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Subgroup analysis for functional status at longest follow up: follow up ≤ 6 months vs. > 6 months
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Functional status at discharge

References

    1. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in Health Systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549974.
    1. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation 2030. WHO. 2021. https://www.who.int/initiatives/rehabilitation-2030. Accessed 28 Mar 2022.
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Lond Engl. 2012;380:2163–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A, Egger M, Stuck AE, Clough-Gorr KM. Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010;340:1230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Balen R, Gordon AL, Schols JMGA, Drewes YM, Achterberg WP. What is geriatric rehabilitation and how should it be organized? A Delphi study aimed at reaching European consensus. Eur Geriatr Med. 2019;10:977–87. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources