Prevention and management of plant protection product transfers within the environment: A review
- PMID: 39579183
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-35496-9
Prevention and management of plant protection product transfers within the environment: A review
Abstract
The intensification of agriculture has promoted the simplification and specialization of agroecosystems, resulting in negative impacts such as decreasing landscape heterogeneity and increasing use of plant protection products (PPP), with the acceleration of PPP transfers to environmental compartments and loss in biodiversity. In this context, the present work reviews the various levers for action promoting the prevention and management of these transfers in the environment and the available modelling tools. Two main categories of levers were identified: (1) better control of the application, including the reduction of doses and of PPP dispersion during application thanks to appropriate equipment and settings, PPP formulations and consideration of meteorological conditions; (2) reduction of post-application transfers at plot scales (soil cover, low tillage, organic matter management, remediation etc. and at landscape scales using either dry (grassed strips, forest, hedgerows and ditches) or wet (ponds, mangroves and stormwater basins) buffer zones. The management of PPP residues leftover in the spray tanks (biobeds) also represents a lever for limiting point-source PPP pollution. Numerous models have been developed to simulate the transfers of PPPs at plot scales. They are scarce for landscape scales. A few are used for regulatory risk assessment. These models could still be improved, for example, if current agricultural practices (e.g. agro-ecological practices and biopesticides), and their effect on PPP transfers were better described. If operated alone, none of the levers guarantee a zero risk of PPP transfer. However, if levers are applied in a combined manner, PPP transfers could be more easily limited (agricultural practices, landscape organization etc.).
Keywords: Buffer zones; Collective scientific assessment; Effluent management; Landscape; Modelling; Pesticides; Remediation; Soil management.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable Consent to publish: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Adak T, Mahapatra B, Swain H, Patil NB, Pandi GGP, Gowda GB, Annamalai M, Pokhare SS, Meena KS, Rath PC, Jena M (2020) Indigenous biobed to limit point source pollution of imidacloprid in tropical countries. J Environ Manage 272:8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111084 - DOI
-
- Adriaanse PI (1996) Fate of pesticides in field ditches: the TOXSWA simulation model, SC-DLO, Wageningen. https://edepot.wur.nl/363765 . Accessed 10 May 2023
-
- Adriaanse PI (1997) Exposure assessment of pesticides in field ditches: the TOXSWA model. Pesti Sci 49:210–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199702)49:2%3c210::AID-PS496%3e3... - DOI
-
- Alletto L, Coquet Y, Benoit P, Heddadj D, Barriuso E (2010) Tillage management effects on pesticide fate in soils. A Review Agron Sustain Dev 30:367–400. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009018 - DOI
-
- Amichot M, Bertrand C, Chauvel B, Corio-Costet MF, Martin-Laurent F, Le Perchec S, Mamy L (2024) Natural products for biocontrol: review of their fate in the environment and impacts on biodiversity. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33256-3 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources