A conceptual framework of indicators for the suitability of forests for outdoor recreation
- PMID: 39579265
- PMCID: PMC11662111
- DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02091-8
A conceptual framework of indicators for the suitability of forests for outdoor recreation
Abstract
Forests' ability to provide opportunities for recreation is an important ecosystem service. This has prompted attempts to create indicators to assess forests' suitability for recreation, although hitherto with limited success. This study introduces a novel framework for indicators of potential and realised recreational values of forests, with a primary focus on Sweden and Fennoscandia. We divided forest attributes into intrinsic qualities (i.e. the structure and composition of the forest), extrinsic qualities (i.e. the location of the forest in relation to other components of the landscape), and facilitation qualities (i.e. the presence of recreational infrastructure). Using Fennoscandia as a case study, we performed a literature review to find specific indicators of recreational values, as well as evaluate the current availability of spatial data suitable to map the forest qualities on a national scale. The most important intrinsic quality we identified was tree size/age, whereas for extrinsic quality it was proximity to water. Systematic monitoring of recreational use is essential to estimate realised recreational values. The conceptual framework proved to be a valuable tool for identifying potential indicators, and applying it in other regions is likely to yield useful outcomes.
Keywords: Fennoscandia; Forests; Indicators; Indices; Outdoor recreation; Recreation potential.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Figures

References
-
- Abildtrup, J., S. Garcia, S.B. Olsen, and A. Stenger. 2013. Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecological Economics 92: 67–77. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.001.
-
- Agimass, F., T. Lundhede, T.E. Panduro, and J.B. Jacobsen. 2018. The choice of forest site for recreation: A revealed preference analysis using spatial data. Ecosystem Services 31: 445–454. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.016.
-
- Albacete, X., D. Olaru, V. Paül, and S. Biermann. 2017. Measuring the accessibility of public transport: A critical comparison between methods in Helsinki. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 10: 161–188. 10.1007/s12061-015-9177-8.
-
- Angelstam, P., M. Manton, M. Green, B.-G. Jonsson, G. Mikusiński, J. Svensson, and F. Maria Sabatini. 2020. Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets: A call for adaptive landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 202: 103838. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103838.
-
- Ankre, R., P. Fredman, and A. Lindhagen. 2016. Managers’ experiences of visitor monitoring in Swedish outdoor recreational areas. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 14: 35–40. 10.1016/j.jort.2016.04.008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources