Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb;54(2):184-197.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02091-8. Epub 2024 Nov 23.

A conceptual framework of indicators for the suitability of forests for outdoor recreation

Affiliations
Review

A conceptual framework of indicators for the suitability of forests for outdoor recreation

Carl Lehto et al. Ambio. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Forests' ability to provide opportunities for recreation is an important ecosystem service. This has prompted attempts to create indicators to assess forests' suitability for recreation, although hitherto with limited success. This study introduces a novel framework for indicators of potential and realised recreational values of forests, with a primary focus on Sweden and Fennoscandia. We divided forest attributes into intrinsic qualities (i.e. the structure and composition of the forest), extrinsic qualities (i.e. the location of the forest in relation to other components of the landscape), and facilitation qualities (i.e. the presence of recreational infrastructure). Using Fennoscandia as a case study, we performed a literature review to find specific indicators of recreational values, as well as evaluate the current availability of spatial data suitable to map the forest qualities on a national scale. The most important intrinsic quality we identified was tree size/age, whereas for extrinsic quality it was proximity to water. Systematic monitoring of recreational use is essential to estimate realised recreational values. The conceptual framework proved to be a valuable tool for identifying potential indicators, and applying it in other regions is likely to yield useful outcomes.

Keywords: Fennoscandia; Forests; Indicators; Indices; Outdoor recreation; Recreation potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The conceptual framework of how recreation visits to a forest are driven by its qualities and accessibility (black arrows). Realised recreational values can be estimated by measuring the number and quality of forest visits by users, while the recreation potential of a forest can be assessed by using the forest’s qualities and accessibility as indicators (green arrows)

References

    1. Abildtrup, J., S. Garcia, S.B. Olsen, and A. Stenger. 2013. Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecological Economics 92: 67–77. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.001.
    1. Agimass, F., T. Lundhede, T.E. Panduro, and J.B. Jacobsen. 2018. The choice of forest site for recreation: A revealed preference analysis using spatial data. Ecosystem Services 31: 445–454. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.016.
    1. Albacete, X., D. Olaru, V. Paül, and S. Biermann. 2017. Measuring the accessibility of public transport: A critical comparison between methods in Helsinki. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 10: 161–188. 10.1007/s12061-015-9177-8.
    1. Angelstam, P., M. Manton, M. Green, B.-G. Jonsson, G. Mikusiński, J. Svensson, and F. Maria Sabatini. 2020. Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets: A call for adaptive landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 202: 103838. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103838.
    1. Ankre, R., P. Fredman, and A. Lindhagen. 2016. Managers’ experiences of visitor monitoring in Swedish outdoor recreational areas. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 14: 35–40. 10.1016/j.jort.2016.04.008.

LinkOut - more resources