Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Nov 23;404(10467):2065-2076.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01865-8.

Efficacy and safety of prostate radiotherapy in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of prostate radiotherapy in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design

Alberto Bossi et al. Lancet. .

Erratum in

  • Department of Error.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet. 2025 May 10;405(10490):1665. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00903-1. Lancet. 2025. PMID: 40348457 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: The 2 × 2 PEACE-1 study showed that combining androgen-deprivation therapy with docetaxel and abiraterone improved overall and radiographic progression-free survival in patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of adding radiotherapy in this population.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design (PEACE-1) at 77 hospitals across Europe. Eligible participants were male patients (aged ≥18 years) with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer confirmed by bone scan, CT, or MRI, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (or 2 in the case of bone pain). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to standard of care (androgen-deprivation therapy alone or with six cycles of intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks), standard of care plus abiraterone (oral 1000 mg abiraterone once daily plus oral 5 mg prednisone twice daily), standard of care plus radiotherapy (74 Gy in 37 fractions to the prostate), or standard of care plus radiotherapy and abiraterone. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed by intention to treat in patients with low-volume metastatic disease and in the overall study population. This ongoing study is registered with EudraCT, 2012-000142-35.

Findings: Between Nov 27, 2013, and Dec 20, 2018, 1173 patients were enrolled and 1172 were randomly assigned to receive standard of care (n=296 [25·3%]), standard of care plus abiraterone (n=292 [24·9%]), standard of care plus radiotherapy (n=293 [25·0%]), and standard of care plus abiraterone and radiotherapy (n=291 [24·8%]). Median follow-up was 6·0 years (IQR 5·1-7·0) at the time of radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival analysis. A qualitative interaction between radiotherapy and abiraterone for radiographic progression-free survival in the population of patients with low-volume disease prevented the pooling of intervention groups for analysis (p=0·026). Adding radiotherapy to standard of care improved radiographic progression-free survival in patients with low-volume disease treated with abiraterone (median 4·4 years [99·9% CI 2·5-7·3] in the standard of care plus abiraterone group vs 7·5 years [4·0-not reached] in the standard of care plus abiraterone and radiotherapy group; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·65 [99·9% CI 0·36-1·19]; p=0·019), but not in patients not treated with abiraterone (median 3·0 years [99·9% CI 2·3-4·8] in the standard of care group vs 2·6 years [1·7-4·6] in the standard of care plus radiotherapy group; 1·08 [0·65-1·80]; p=0·61). For overall survival, the predefined threshold for a statistical interaction was not reached (p=0·12); therefore, the two intervention groups receiving radiotherapy were pooled together for analysis. In patients with low-volume disease, the overall survival was not influenced by radiotherapy (median 6·9 years [95·1% CI 5·9-7·5] for standard of care with or without abiraterone vs 7·5 years [6·0-not reached] for standard of care plus radiotherapy with or without abiraterone; HR 0·98 [95·1% CI 0·74-1·28]; p=0·86). In the overall safety population, 339 (56·1%) of 604 patients who did not receive radiotherapy and 329 (58·8%) of 560 patients who received radiotherapy developed at least one severe adverse event (grade ≥3), the most common being hypertension (110 [18·2%] patients in the standard of care with or without abiraterone group and 127 [22·7%] in the standard of care plus radiotherapy with or without abiraterone group) and neutropenia (40 [6·6%] and 29 [5·2%]).

Interpretation: Combining radiotherapy with standard of care plus abiraterone improves radiographic progression-free survival and castration resistance-free survival, but not overall survival in patients with low-volume de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Radiotherapy reduces the occurrence of serious genitourinary events, regardless of metastatic burden and without increasing the overall toxicity, and could become a component of standard of care in patients with both high-volume and low-volume de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Funding: Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Sanofi, and Institut National du Cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests AB reports consulting fees from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Elekta Brachytherapy, Ferring, and Recordati; honoraria from Accord, Astellas Pharma, Elekta Brachytherapy, Janssen, Ipsen, and Recordati; and research grants from Janssen and Ipsen. SF reports participation in the data and safety monitoring board of Gilead Science, with payment made to her institution. PS reports consulting fees and honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, and Janssen; and support for attending meetings from Bayer and Janssen. RMD reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Ipsen, and MSD; and support for attending meetings from Bayer, Novartis, and Pfizer. AF reports honoraria from Adacap, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Novartis. BT reports grants from Bayer and Ferring; personal fees from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Ferring, Myovant, Novartis, and Sanofi; and non-financial support from Astellas and Janssen. SS reports honoraria from Adacap, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Curium, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, and Recordati; and support for attending meetings from Accord, Adacap, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Curium, Janssen, Ipsen, and MSD. DB reports honoraria, support for attending meetings, and a fiduciary role in other boards from Janssen, with payment made to his institution. KF reports consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Bayer, CureVac, Janssen, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, and Sanofi; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Novartis, and Sanofi; and participation in a data and safety monitoring board for Lilly, with payment made to his institution. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Comment in

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources