Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;20(52):e2407487.
doi: 10.1002/smll.202407487. Epub 2024 Nov 24.

Magnetically Responsive Enzyme and Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework Biocomposites for Biosensing

Affiliations

Magnetically Responsive Enzyme and Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework Biocomposites for Biosensing

Francesco Carraro et al. Small. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

The one-pot synthesis of multicomponent hydrogen-bonded organic framework (HOF) biocomposites is reported. The co-immoblization of enzymes and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) into the HOF crystals yielded biocatalysts (MNPs-enzyme@BioHOF-1) with dynamic localization properties. Using a permanent magnet, it is possible to separate the MNPs-enzyme@BioHOF-1 particles from a solution. Catalase (CAT) and glucose oxidase (GOx) show increased retention of their activity when coimmobilized with MNPs. MNPs-GOx@BioHOF-1 biocomposites are used to prepare a proof-of-concept glucose microfluidic biosensor, where a magnet allow to position and keep in place the biocomposite inside a microfluidic chip. The magnetic response of these biocatalysts can pave the way for new applications for the emerging HOF biocomposites.

Keywords: HOF; biocatalysis; biocomposite; biosensor; enzyme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic view of the precursors (left) of the one‐pot synthetic procedure and of the resulting micrometric crystals in water (center) that can be recovered with the help of a permanent magnet (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
a) XRD patterns of MNPs‐CAT@BioHOF‐1, CAT@BioHOF‐1, and BioHOF‐1. b) FTIR spectra of MNPs‐CAT@BioHOF‐1, CAT@BioHOF‐1, BioHOF‐1, MNPs, and CAT. c) SEM, and d) STEM micrographs of MNPs‐CAT@BioHOF‐1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
a) H2O2 and b) O2 consumption rates catalyzed (a) by MNPs‐CAT@BioHOF‐1, CAT@BioHOF‐1, and free CAT, and b) by MNPs‐GOx@BioHOF‐1, GOx@BioHOF‐1, and free GOx. Bar charts that summarize the Encapsulation Efficiency (EE%) and Effectiveness factors (η) of the c) CAT‐containing samples, and d) GOx containing samples.
Figure 4
Figure 4
a–d) Schematic view of the different working steps of the proof‐of‐concept glucose flow sensor. e) Recyclability of the biosensor reported as cycle number (note: 1 cycle = time requested to process a flow of the analyte equal to the volume of the reaction cavity). The trend line (black) is qualitatively representative of the decrease in performance during the exposure to continuous glucose flow. f) Biosensor calibration curve in the glucose concentration range 0.2–2 mm (linear fit: y=(11.7 ± 0.5)+(27.1 ± 0.5)*x, R2=0.997). g) Biosensor calibration curve in the glucose concentration range 6–20 mm (linear fit: y=(24 ± 2)+(6.7 ± 0.2)*x, R2=0.997). Typically, after reaching the steady state, the oxygen concentration was recorded over 10 min: the final value of ΔO2 was averaged on the steady state reached.

References

    1. Bornscheuer U. T., Huisman G. W., Kazlauskas R. J., Lutz S., Moore J. C., Robins K., Nature 2012, 485, 185. - PubMed
    1. Anwar A., Imran M., Iqbal H. M. N., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 493, 215329.
    1. Pullano S. A., Greco M., Bianco M. G., Foti D., Brunetti A., Fiorillo A. S., Theranostics 2022, 12, 493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolivar J. M., Consolati T., Mayr T., Nidetzky B., Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 194. - PubMed
    1. Sassolas A., Blum L. J., Leca‐Bouvier B. D., Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 489. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources