Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jan 15;65(1):15-21.
doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0137. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

Safety and Selection Criteria of Single-joint Hybrid Assistive Limb for Upper Limb Paralysis After Stroke: A Phase I Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety and Selection Criteria of Single-joint Hybrid Assistive Limb for Upper Limb Paralysis After Stroke: A Phase I Trial

Hiroshi Ohmae et al. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). .

Abstract

Robotic rehabilitation is a high-intensity intervention for upper limb paralysis after a stroke. This study explored the safety and feasibility of using a single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL-SJ) exoskeletal device for upper limb paralysis in patients with acute stroke. In total, 11 patients with stroke (6 with moderate paralysis and 5 with severe paralysis) were enrolled between October 2021 and October 2023 in a stroke care unit. The patients underwent HAL training 3 times a week for 6 sessions. No serious adverse events related to HAL-SJ occurred, and participants demonstrated significant improvements in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) (pre- vs. post-intervention; p < 0.05). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FMA-UE was surpassed in 5 patients (83.3%) with moderate paralysis and 2 (40.0%) with severe paralysis. Regarding ARAT, 4 patients (66.7%) with moderate paralysis exceeded the MCID, whereas none (0.0%) with severe paralysis did. These findings suggest that HAL-SJ is both safe and feasible, particularly for individuals with moderate paralysis.

Keywords: rehabilitation; robotics; safety; stroke; upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram and results of a phase I trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of HAL-SJ for upper limb paralysis after stroke. SCU, stroke care unit; BES, bioelectrical signals; BRS, Brunnstrom recovery stage; MCID, minimal clinically important difference; HAL-SJ, single-joint hybrid assistive limb

Similar articles

References

    1. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. : Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006: 296: 2095-2104 - PubMed
    1. Kwakkle G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ: Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003: 34: 2181-2186 - PubMed
    1. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994: 75: 394-398 - PubMed
    1. Kelly KM, Borstad AL, Kline D, Gauthier LV: Improved quality of life following constraint-induced movement therapy is associated with gains in arm use, but not motor improvement. Top Stroke Rehabil 2018: 25: 467-474 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS, Greenwood RJ: Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex 2008: 18: 1909-1922 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types