Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 24;25(1):57.
doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00805-y.

TikTok and frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional study of social media content quality

Affiliations

TikTok and frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional study of social media content quality

Riccardo D'Ambrosi et al. J Orthop Traumatol. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the validity and informational value of the material provided on TikTok regarding frozen shoulders. The hypothesis was that the video content on this platform would not provide adequate and valid information.

Methods: The current study focused on frozen shoulder videos on the TikTok social media platform. The terms "frozen shoulder" and/or "adhesive capsulitis" were used as keywords for an extensive online search of video content on TikTok, and the first 100 videos were included. Out-of-topic, non-English, and duplicated videos were excluded from the analysis. The duration and numbers of likes, shares, and views were recorded for each video. Further, videos were categorized based on the source (physiotherapist/osteopath, medical doctor, or private user), type of information (physical therapy, etiopathogenesis, anatomy, clinical examination, patient experience, or symptoms), video content (rehabilitation, education, or patient experience/testimony), and the presence of music or a voice. The assessment of the video content's quality and reliability was performed by two experienced shoulder surgeons using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS).

Results: A total of 100 videos were included in the analysis, of which 86 (86.0%) were published by physiotherapists/osteopaths. Most of the information and video content focused on physical therapy and rehabilitation (83.0% and 84.0%, respectively). Eighty-four (84.0%) videos included voice comments, while the remaining featured music. The mean number of views was 2,142,215.32 ± 6,148,794.63, while the mean numbers of likes, comments, and shares were 58,438.67 ± 201,863.54, 550.81 ± 1712.22, and 3327.43 ± 7320.81, respectively. The mean video duration was 110.20 ± 116.43 s. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 16.17 ± 2.36, 0.61 ± 0.51, and 1.18 ± 0.41, respectively. Videos posted by medical doctors or private users received higher scores than those posted by physiotherapists/osteopaths (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The educational value of videos published on TikTok was poor; videos posted by medical doctors exhibited better quality and educational value than those of physiotherapists or osteopaths. It is the responsibility of orthopedic surgeons to investigate the potential benefits, consequences, and implications of TikTok video content for the health of frozen shoulder patients and to propose necessary adjustments. Given the rapid growth of TikTok, further research is needed.

Level of evidence: Level IV-cross-sectional study.

Keywords: Adhesive capsulitis; Arthroscopy; Frozen shoulder; Physical therapy; Reels; Rehabilitation; Social media; TikTok.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This article does not require approval by the ethics committee, as no data on human beings were used, only videos that present on TikTok and are therefore publicly accessible to anyone.This article does not require approval by the participants, as no data on human beings were used. Consent for publication: All authors consent to the publication of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A flowchart of the video screening performed in this study

References

    1. Picasso R, Pistoia F, Zaottini F, Marcenaro G, Miguel-Pérez M, Tagliafico AS, Martinoli C (2023) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: current concepts on the diagnostic work-up and evidence-based protocol for radiological evaluation. Diagnostics 13:3410. 10.3390/diagnostics13223410 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Korkoman AJ, Alammari AS, Alqahtani NH, AlQahtani AA (2023) The incidence of adhesive capsulitis and COVID-19 pandemic effect. JSES Int 7:2406–2409. 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.007 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baradaran A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Sabzevari S, Baradaran A, Razi S, Kachooei AR (2023) Is there any advantage between using continuous passive motion and conventional physical therapy in patients with primary adhesive capsulitis?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther 36:133–141. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.06.005 - PubMed
    1. Millar NL, Meakins A, Struyf F, Willmore E, Campbell AL, Kirwan PD, Akbar M, Moore L, Ronquillo JC, Murrell GAC, Rodeo SA (2022) Frozen shoulder. Nat Rev Dis Primers 8:59. 10.1038/s41572-022-00386-2 - PubMed
    1. Robinson CM, Seah KT, Chee YH, Hindle P, Murray IR (2012) Frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1–9. 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27093 - PubMed