Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Nov 15:2024:1716798.
doi: 10.1155/2024/1716798. eCollection 2024.

Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Complaints: Results From Two Randomized Studies

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Complaints: Results From Two Randomized Studies

Nils Thorm Milman et al. J Pregnancy. .

Abstract

Background: Many pregnant women are reluctant to follow the recommendation concerning oral iron prophylaxis due to concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Objective: To assess the frequency of GI complaints during low-dose oral iron prophylaxis and compare three iron formulas in equipotent doses: ferrous fumarate versus ferrous bisglycinate versus ferrous sulphate, in healthy women with an uncomplicated single pregnancy. Methods: Results from two randomized, double-blind studies are reported: the Gentofte study comprising 404 women allocated into four groups taking 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate/day and the Naestved study comprising 78 women allocated into two groups: 25 mg of elemental iron as ferrous bisglycinate/day and 50 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate/day between meals from 15 to 19 weeks of gestation to delivery. GI complaints (nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain/pyrosis, belching, meteorism, borborygmi, intestinal colic, flatulence, loose stools, constipation, and use of laxatives), as well as black stools, were recorded by interview at the time of inclusion and at regular intervals during gestation. Results: At inclusion, the frequency of total combined GI complaints in all women (n = 482) was 21%. The Gentofte study showed that in the groups taking 20-60 mg iron/day as fumarate, there was no association between the iron dose and the frequency of GI side effects. An iron dose of 80 mg as fumarate was associated with significantly higher frequencies of constipation and the use of laxatives. Comparing the three equipotent doses of iron formulas, which can prevent iron deficiency, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had the most favourable GI side effect profile, while ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron had higher but similar GI side effect profiles. The frequency of black stools increased with the iron dose. Ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron had a lower frequency of black stools (8%) than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron (22%) and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron (31%). Conclusion: Low-dose iron supplementation appears to have no clinically significant GI side effects, as none of the included women presented with GI complaints of such severity that it necessitated either reduction of iron dose, change to an alternative iron formula, or discontinuation of iron supplement. However, ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron/day is associated with significantly fewer GI complaints than ferrous fumarate 40 mg iron/day and ferrous sulphate 50 mg iron/day. Ferrous bisglycinate may be preferred for iron prophylaxis, especially in women experiencing GI side effects when taking other conventional iron formulas.

Keywords: ferrous bisglycinate; ferrous fumarate; ferrous sulphate; iron; iron deficiency; pregnancy; prophylaxis; side effects; supplement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Krafft A., Murray-Kolb L., Milman N. Anemia and iron deficiency in pregnancy. Editorial. Journal of Pregnancy, Special issue “Anemia and Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy”. Journal of Pregnancy . 2012;2012(1) doi: 10.1155/2012/241869.241869 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milman N., Bergholt T., Eriksen L., et al. Iron prophylaxis during pregnancy – how much iron is needed? A randomized dose– response study of 20-80 mg ferrous iron daily in pregnant women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica . 2005;84(3):238–247. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00610.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Danish Health Authority recommendations for pregnancy care. January 2024, https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2021/Anbefalinger-svangreomsorgen/....
    1. Knudsen V. K., Hansen H. S., Ovesen L., Mikkelsen T. B., Olsen S. F. Iron supplement use among Danish pregnant women. Public Health Nutrition . 2007;10(10):1104–1110. doi: 10.1017/S136898000769956X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Løvschal L. B., Høgh S., Bergholt T., et al. Iron supplementation during the first trimester of pregnancy after a national change of recommendation: a Danish cross-sectional study. Journal of Nutritional Science . 2022;11, article e19 doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources