Hybrid registration of the fibula for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies in mandibular reconstructive surgery: a phantom study
- PMID: 39585544
- DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03282-0
Hybrid registration of the fibula for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies in mandibular reconstructive surgery: a phantom study
Abstract
Purpose: In mandibular reconstructive surgery with free fibula flap, 3D-printed patient-specific cutting guides are the current state of the art. Although these guides enable accurate transfer of the virtual surgical plan to the operating room, disadvantages include long waiting times until surgery and the inability to change the virtual plan intraoperatively in case of tumor growth. Alternatively, (electromagnetic) surgical navigation combined with a non-patient-specific cutting guide could be used, requiring accurate image-to-patient registration. In this phantom study, we evaluated the accuracy of a hybrid registration method for the fibula and the additional error that is caused by navigating with a prototype of a novel non-patient-specific cutting guide to virtually planned osteotomy planes.
Methods: The accuracy of hybrid registration and navigation was assessed in terms of target registration error (TRE), angular difference, and length difference of the intended fibula segments using three 3D-printed fibular phantoms with assessment points on osteotomy planes. Using electromagnetic tracking, hybrid registration was performed with point registration followed by surface registration on the lateral fibular surface. The fibula was fixated in the non-patient-specific cutting guide to navigate to planned osteotomy planes after which the accuracy was assessed.
Results: Registration was achieved with a mean TRE, angular difference, and segment length difference of 2.3 ± 0.9 mm, 2.1 ± 1.4°, and 0.3 ± 0.3 mm respectively after hybrid registration. Navigation with the novel cutting guide increased the length difference (0.7 ± 0.6 mm), but decreased the angular difference (1.8 ± 1.3°).
Conclusion: Hybrid registration showed to be a feasible and noninvasive method to register the fibula in phantom setup and could be used for electromagnetically navigated osteotomies with a novel non-patient-specific cutting guide. Future studies should focus on testing this registration method in clinical setting.
Keywords: Electromagnetic navigation; Electromagnetic tracking; Mandibular reconstruction; Osteocutaneous fibula free flap; Registration; Surgical navigation; Virtual surgical planning.
© 2024. CARS.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Informed consent: For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Similar articles
-
Navigation-guided fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: A proof of concept study.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Apr;72(4):572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.026. Epub 2019 Feb 10. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019. PMID: 30803870
-
A hybrid registration method using the mandibular bone surface for electromagnetic navigation in mandibular surgery.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Jul;17(7):1343-1353. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02610-6. Epub 2022 Apr 20. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022. PMID: 35441961
-
A surgical navigated cutting guide for mandibular osteotomies: accuracy and reproducibility of an image-guided mandibular osteotomy.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Oct;15(10):1719-1725. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02234-8. Epub 2020 Jul 28. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020. PMID: 32725399
-
Augmented reality-guided osteotomies for simulated mandibular reconstruction with fibular bone using virtual cutting guides and 3D navigation.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Apr;63(3):246-251. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.009. Epub 2025 Feb 3. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40069052
-
Fibular registration using surface matching in navigation-guided osteotomies: a proof of concept study on 3D-printed models.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Jul;17(7):1321-1331. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02608-0. Epub 2022 Apr 4. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022. PMID: 35377035
Cited by
-
Comparison of the accuracy of different slot properties of 3D-printed cutting guides for raising free fibular flaps using saw or piezoelectric instruments: an in vitro study.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s11548-025-03474-2. Online ahead of print. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025. PMID: 40650803
References
-
- IKNL (2023) Incidentie hoofd-halskanker. IKNL. https://iknl.nl/kankersoorten/hoofd-halskanker/registratie/incidentie Accessed 5 February 2024.
-
- Bahadur S (1990) Mandibular involvement in oral cancer. J Laryngol Otol 104:968–971. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100114501 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barttelbort SW, Bahn SL, Ariyan SA (1987) Rim mandibulectomy for cancer of the oral cavity. Am J Surg 154:423–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90017-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tsue TT, McCulloch TM, Girod DA, Couper DJ, Weymuller EA Jr, Glenn MG (1994) Predictors of carcinomatous invasion of the mandible. Head Neck 16:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2880160204 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chandu A, Smith ACH, Rogers SN (2006) Health-related quality of life in oral cancer: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.028 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources