Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.

Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Daniel S Reuland et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but remains underused in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a centralized CRC screening outreach intervention involving mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to colonoscopy after abnormal results of FIT.

Design, setting, and participants: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted, using intention-to-treat analysis. Participants were enrolled from July 6, 2020, to September 17, 2021, and analyses were performed from July 6, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The study was conducted at independent FQHCs comprising 12 clinical delivery sites in North Carolina. The outreach intervention was centralized at an academic cancer center. Active individuals aged 50 to 75 years at average risk for CRC and not current with screening per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations were included.

Intervention: In addition to usual care, intervention participants received mailed screening outreach materials including an introductory letter, FIT kit packet with instructions and return postage, and 2 reminder letters if needed. Intervention participants with positive results of mailed FIT were offered navigation to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy completion. Control participants received usual care alone.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was completion of a US Preventive Services Task Force-recommended CRC screening test within 6 months determined by electronic health record review. Secondary outcomes were colonoscopy completion within 6 months after positive FIT results and detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia, defined as advanced adenoma or CRC.

Results: A total of 4002 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [6.8] years; 2256 [56.4%] female; 364 (9.1%) Hispanic; 1082 [27.0%] non-Hispanic Black; 2288 [57.2%] non-Hispanic White; 1198 [29.9%] commercially insured; 617 [15.4%] Medicaid; 1227 [30.7%] Medicare; and 960 [24.0%] uninsured), with 2001 randomized to each group. Compared with controls, intervention participants were more likely to complete screening within 6 months of randomization (30.0% vs 9.7%; difference, 20.29 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.85-22.73 percentage points). The intervention was effective in all insurance types. In the intervention arm, 33 of 48 participants with positive FIT results (68.8%) completed follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months compared with 8 of 18 participants (44.4%) in the control arm (difference, 24.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.13 to 50.74 percentage points). Advanced colorectal neoplasia was detected in 29 intervention participants (1.4%) and 15 control participants (0.7%) (difference, 0.68 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.05-1.35 percentage points).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of centralized screening outreach intervention in diverse patients served by independent FQHCs, CRC screening completion and advanced colorectal neoplasia detection were substantially increased. Future studies should examine the cost and scalability of this intervention in this context.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406714.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Crockett reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute (NCI) U award during the conduct of the study; clinical trial agreement from Exact Sciences, Guardant, and Freenome; and consultant fees from Carelon Inc outside the submitted work. Dr Farr reported receiving grants from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the NCI during the conduct of the study. Dr Malo reported being employed by the American Cancer Society, with salary supported by Genentech, the National Football League, and Becton Dickinson outside the submitted work. Dr Wheeler reported receiving grants from Pfizer and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Patient Flowchart
Twenty-eight patients (14 intervention, 14 control) were found retrospectively to have completed screening in the 30 days before randomization; all were included in the analysis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Endoscopic Outcomes
Analysis in patients who completed at least 1 endoscopic test up to 12 months after randomization (control: 111; intervention: 129). Outcomes were not determined in 8 patients due to missing endoscopic reports. aAdvanced colorectal neoplasia includes advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer diagnoses (n = 7). Most patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were in the intervention arm (n = 5).

References

    1. Joseph DA, King JB, Dowling NF, Thomas CC, Richardson LC. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(10):253-259. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6910a1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amboree TL, Montealegre JR, Parker SL, et al. National breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening use in federally qualified health centers. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(6):671-679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0693 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dougherty MK, Brenner AT, Crockett SD, et al. Evaluation of interventions intended to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levin TR, Jamieson L, Burley DA, Reyes J, Oehrli M, Caldwell C. Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:101-110. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Selby K, Jensen CD, Levin TR, et al. Program components and results from an organized colorectal cancer screening program using annual fecal immunochemical testing. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(1):145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.042 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data