Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;38(4):2053-2062.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01340-2. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

Deep Learning-Based DCE-MRI Automatic Segmentation in Predicting Lesion Nature in BI-RADS Category 4

Affiliations

Deep Learning-Based DCE-MRI Automatic Segmentation in Predicting Lesion Nature in BI-RADS Category 4

Tianyu Liu et al. J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

To investigate whether automatic segmentation based on DCE-MRI with a deep learning (DL) algorithm enabled advantages over manual segmentation in differentiating BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. A total of 197 patients with suspicious breast lesions from two medical centers were enrolled in this study. Patients treated at the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao between January 2018 and April 2024 were included as the training set (n = 138). Patients treated at Lanzhou University Second Hospital were assigned to an external validation set (n = 59). Areas of suspicious lesions were delineated based on DL automatic segmentation and manual segmentation, and evaluated consistency through the Dice correlation coefficient. Radiomics models were constructed based on DL and manual segmentations to predict the nature of BI-RADS 4 lesions. Meanwhile, the nature of the lesions was evaluated by both a professional radiologist and a non-professional radiologist. Finally, the area under the curve value (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to determine which prediction model was more effective. Sixty-four malignant cases (32.5%) and 133 benign cases (67.5%) were included in this study. The DL-based automatic segmentation model showed high consistency with manual segmentation, achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.84 ± 0.11. The DL-based radiomics model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to professional radiologists, with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92). The DL model significantly reduced working time and improved efficiency by 83.2% compared to manual segmentation, further demonstrating its feasibility for clinical applications. The DL-based radiomics model for automatic segmentation outperformed professional radiologists in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions in BI-RADS category 4, thereby helping to avoid unnecessary biopsies. This groundbreaking progress suggests that the DL model is expected to be widely applied in clinical practice in the near future, providing an effective auxiliary tool for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

Keywords: BI-RADS 4; Breast cancer; DCE-MRI; Deep learning; Radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics Approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of First Hospital of Qinhuangdao (2024K006). Consent to Participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow of the automatic segmentation model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The figure presents the relevant data and imaging for a patient diagnosed with a benign lesion. a Shows the patient’s original dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) images, b depicts the three-dimensional reconstruction of the tumor, c displays the image segmentation results using deep learning technology, d presents the manual segmentation results, e illustrates the corresponding pathological slide images, and f provides the visualization heat map of the tumor’s features. g Visually compares the predictive accuracy obtained using different technologies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The figure illustrates the relevant data and imaging for a patient diagnosed with a malignant lesion. a Shows the patient’s original dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) images, b depicts the three-dimensional reconstruction of the tumor, c displays the image segmentation results obtained using deep learning technology, d presents the manual segmentation results, e illustrates the corresponding pathological slide images, and f provides the visualization heat map of the tumor’s features. g Visually compares the predictive accuracy achieved using different technologies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The AUC of radiomics models based on DL and manual segmentation in assessing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The AUC of senior and junior radiologists in assessing in assessing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions both in training and testing sets

References

    1. Siegel R L, Miller K D. Cancer statistics, 2022 [J]. 2022, 72(1): 7–33. - PubMed
    1. Mota B S, Reis Y N, de Barros N, et al. Effects of preoperative magnetic resonance image on survival rates and surgical planning in breast cancer conservative surgery: randomized controlled trial (BREAST-MRI trial) [J]. Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023, 198(3): 447-61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. SPAK D A, PLAXCO J S, SANTIAGO L, et al. BI-RADS(®) fifth edition: A summary of changes [J]. Diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2017, 98(3): 179-90. - PubMed
    1. GRADISHAR W J, MORAN M S, ABRAHAM J, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2021 [J]. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2021, 19(5): 484-93. - PubMed
    1. COZZI A, DI LEO G, HOUSSAMI N, et al. Screening and diagnostic breast MRI: how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study [J]. 2023, 33(9): 6213-25. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources