Sequential Transfer of Blastocysts on Day 5 and Day 6 in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle
- PMID: 39586989
- DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01734-1
Sequential Transfer of Blastocysts on Day 5 and Day 6 in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate which frozen embryo transfer (FET) strategy benefits the recurrent implantation failure (RIF) population. A retrospective study of 336 women with RIF was performed from July 2020 to October 2023. The patients were divided into three groups according to the FET protocol. The three FET protocols included transferring a blastocyst on both days 5 and 6 (Group 1, n = 138); transferring a cleavage-stage embryo on day 3 and a blastocyst on day 5 (Group 2, n = 55); and transferring double blastocysts on day 5 (Group 3, n = 143).The sequential day 5 and day 6 blastocyst ET strategy significantly improved in vitro fertilization success rates compared with those of both the traditional double-blastocyst day 5 transfer strategy and the strategy involving one cleavage-stage embryo transfer on day 3 and one blastocyst transfer on day 5 in RIF patients. Compared with those observed in Day 5 double-blastocyst transfer, the rates of clinical pregnancy and implantation increased (51.75% vs. 64.49%, P < 0.001 and 37.06% vs. 41.3%, P = 0.005, respectively), while the rates of biochemical pregnancy and multiple gestation decreased (18.18% vs. 12.32%, P = 0.006 and 43.24% vs. 28.09%, P = 0.044, respectively) with the new protocol.Blastocysts from sequential embryo transfer on day 5 and day 6 were more effective than those from the traditional FET protocol at improving pregnancy outcomes and lowering the multiple pregnancy rate in RIF patients. When only one or zero good-quality blastocysts are available, sequential blastocyst ET on days 5 and 6 should be considered.
Keywords: Blastocyst transfer; Endometrial receptivity; Recurrent implantation failure (RIF); Sequential embryo transfer; Window of implantation (WOI).
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reproductive Investigation.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC on April 17, 2023, IRB code NO.2023-RE-119. Consent to Participate: All the patients signed informed consent before participating in the study. All procedures were conducted according to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Consent for Publication: All authors gave consent for publication. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparing the effect of sequential embryo transfer versus double blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in patients with repeated implantation failure: A randomized controlled trial.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;62(2):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.10.009. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36965893 Clinical Trial.
-
The optimal frozen embryo transfer strategy for the recurrent implantation failure patient without blastocyst freezing: thawing day 3 embryos and culturing to day 5 blastocysts.Zygote. 2023 Dec;31(6):596-604. doi: 10.1017/S0967199423000503. Epub 2023 Nov 16. Zygote. 2023. PMID: 37969109
-
Sequential embryo transfer versus double cleavage-stage embryo or double blastocyst transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure with frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 8;14:1238251. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1238251. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37745696 Free PMC article.
-
Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2023 Sep 5;29(5):570-633. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad010. Hum Reprod Update. 2023. PMID: 37192834
-
Sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and IVF outcomes: a systematic review.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Sep 14;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00824-y. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 34521412 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Das M, Holzer HE. Recurrent implantation failure: gamete and embryo factors. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):1021–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.029 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Muter J, Lynch VJ, Mccoy RC, Brosens JJ. Human embryo implantation. Development. 2023;150(10). https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.201507 .
-
- Gao J, Yuan Y, Li J, et al. Sequential embryo transfer versus double cleavage-stage embryo or double blastocyst transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure with frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1238251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1238251 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Machtinger R, Dor J, Margolin M, et al. Sequential transfer of day 3 embryos and blastocysts after previous IVF failures despite adequate ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(3):376–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61442-3 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yazbeck C, Ben JN, Hazout A, Cohen-Bacrie P, Junca AM, Rougier N. Advantages of the two-step embryo transfer strategy in human IVF/ICSI cycles. Zygote. 2013;21(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096719941100058X . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources