Biofilm and Its Characteristics in Venous Ulcers

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the characteristics of the biofilm of venous ulcers in terms of location and formation and to relate the presence of the biofilm to ulcer characteristics including duration, injured area, and necrotic tissue.

Design: Descriptive clinical study.

Materials and methods: We obtained 2 biopsy fragments (tissue samples) from 44 patients with venous ulcers treated at a public outpatient clinic in a university hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Ulcers were photographed and classified according to the duration. In addition, the wound size and proportion of wound surface covered by necrotic tissue were measured. One fragment from each ulcer underwent microbiological analysis, while the other was analyzed using transmission electron microscopy. Data analysis was limited to fragments from patients with bacteria in the microbiological analysis.

Results: Data analysis is based on samples obtained from 21 ulcers in 21 patients who had bacteria in their ulcer based on microbiologic analysis of a tissue sample. Most ulcers were open for 2 to 10 years, 57% (n = 12) were 16 cm2 or smaller, and the proportion of the wound bed covered by necrotic tissue coverage varied widely. Of the 21/44 patients (48%) with bacteria in their ulcers, only 3 patients had bacterial biofilm present in the transmission electron microscopy, corresponding to 7% of the 44 patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequent bacterium, identified in 10 fragments. The biofilm was not present on the surface but in a layer slightly below it. The detection of biofilms was not directly related to the duration of the ulcer. It was not possible to establish a correlation between the size of the lesion and the presence of these microorganisms due to the small sample size.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that detecting biofilm in venous ulcers is challenging, as it does not uniformly occur throughout the wound bed, can occur at different depths, and is often not present on the wound surface. There is a need to develop studies that can contribute to the detection of biofilm in clinical practice.