Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 22;31(11):6475-6487.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110480.

Clinical Outcome Patterns of Use of Radium-223 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Clinical Outcome Patterns of Use of Radium-223 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Colleen Mackenzie et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223) is a bone-targeting radioisotope therapy that aids in the survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to bones. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with mCRPC treated with radium-223 in a real-world setting. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with mCRPC treated with radium-223 between 2016 and 2020 at the London Health Sciences Centre in London, Canada. The baseline characteristics between the patients receiving 1-3 and 4-6 treatment cycles were compared using a two-sample t-test and Chi-square test. ANOVA was used to determine if there was a difference in each diagnostic variable per treatment cycle. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in the patients treated with different numbers of cycles. Results: Fifty eligible patients were identified. The median age was 71 years (IQR: 66-76). Most patients (62%) received radium-223 beyond the third-line treatment. The mean number of radium-223 treatments was four. While 60% of the patients received 4-6 injections, 40% received 1-3 injections. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of the patients demonstrated a clinical benefit, with the remainder expressing either disease progression (28%) or stable disease (10%). The patients treated with 4-6 cycles had a delay to disease progression compared to those given 1-3 cycles of radium-223 (F5,35 = 10.52, p < 0.001). A higher alkaline phosphatase level prior to treatment was associated with a longer PFS (z33 = 2.362, p = 0.018). Treatment-related hospitalization for skeletal-related events was noted in 8% of the patients, and 14% required treatment discontinuation due to hematologic toxicity. Conclusions: This study confirms the safety of radium-223 in patients with mCRPC in a real-world setting. The radium-223 treatment was associated with a clinical benefit in the majority of the patients, particularly in those with higher pre-treatment serum alkaline phosphatase levels. Further studies to identify the predictive biomarkers are warranted to better guide the contemporary use of radium-223.

Keywords: bone metastasis; castration-resistant prostate cancer; clinical outcomes; radium-223.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Ricardo Fernandes has the following disclosures: Advisory Board Member or Honoraria: Merck, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, BMS, Ipsen, and Bayer; Travel Grant: Janssen. The other authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlations between patient variables before and after first radium-223 treatment cycles, where significant correlations are indicated by trendline (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
ANOVA analysis to determine statistical significance in time to progression between patients treated with different numbers of cycles of radium-223. Boxplot includes the distribution of time to progression per number of treatment cycles. Outliers are indicated with a dot, but they were not removed per intent to treat. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival of patients who underwent 1–3 cycles or 4–6 cycles.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival of patients who underwent 1–4 cycles or 5–6 cycles.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival of patients receiving 1–3 cycles or 4–6 cycles.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival of patients receiving 1–4 cycles or 5–6 cycles.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharifi N., Gulley J.L., Dahut W.L. Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. [(accessed on 4 July 2024)];J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2005 294:238–244. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.2.238. Available online: https://jamanetwork.com/ - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harris W.P., Mostaghel E.A., Nelson P.S., Montgomery B. Androgen deprivation therapy: Progress in understanding mechanisms of resistance and optimizing androgen depletion. Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol. 2009;6:76–85. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1296. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prostate Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: An overview of 22 randomised trials with 3283 deaths in 5710 patients. Lancet. 1995;346:265–269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92163-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cookson M.S., Roth B.J., Dahm P., Engstrom C., Freedland S.J., Hussain M., Lin D.W., Lowrance W.T., Murad M.H., Oh W.K., et al. Castration-resistant prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J. Urol. 2013;190:429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources