Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 26:26:e52552.
doi: 10.2196/52552.

Effects of Virtual Care on Patient and Provider Experience of the Clinical Encounter: Qualitative Hermeneutic Study

Affiliations

Effects of Virtual Care on Patient and Provider Experience of the Clinical Encounter: Qualitative Hermeneutic Study

Graham McCaffrey et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Virtual health care has transformed health care delivery, with its use dramatically increasing since the COVID-19 pandemic. While it has been quickly adopted for its convenience and efficiency, there has been a relative lack of in-depth exploration of its human impact, specifically how both patients and providers experience clinical encounters.

Objective: This analysis aims to identify and explore themes of change in how patients and providers in a geographically dispersed renal service described their experiences with virtual care, including those changes that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Hermeneutics is an interpretive research methodology that treats human experience as inherently interpretive, generating meaning through interactions with others in specific, historically conditioned, social contexts. A total of 17 patients and 10 providers from various disciplines were interviewed by phone as part of a study on health care implementation in the context of a kidney care service in northern British Columbia, Canada. The interview data were analyzed using a hermeneutic approach, which emphasizes careful attention to reported experiences in relation to the relationships and contexts of care.

Results: During analysis, the interdisciplinary team identified themes related to changes in the clinical encounter and how virtual care influenced perceptions of care among both providers and patients. We organized these themes into 2 categories: the structure and content of the encounter. The structure category included the convenience for patients, who no longer had to travel long distances for appointments, as well as changes in care networks. For example, communication between specialist services and local primary care providers became more crucial for ensuring continuity of care. The content category included issues related to trust-building and assessment. Providers expressed concerns about the difficulty in assessing and understanding their patients' physical and social well-being beyond laboratory results.

Conclusions: Patients in the study appreciated the convenience of not needing to travel for appointments, while still having the option for in-person contact with local providers or specialists if their condition changed. Providers were more concerned about the loss of visual cues and sensory data for assessments, as well as the reduced opportunity to build relationships through conversation with patients. Providers also described changes in the locus of control and boundaries, as patients could join phone encounters from anywhere, bypassing traditional privacy and confidentiality boundaries. The study offers a nuanced view of the effects of virtual care on clinical encounters in one setting, seen through the experiences of both patients and providers.

Keywords: British Columbia; COVID-19; Canada; eHealth; health care facility; health informatics; hermeneutics; kidney; pandemic; patient experience; physician; professional-patient relations; qualitative research; telehealth; virtual medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Virtual care in Canada. CIHI. 2023. Apr 13, [2024-10-10]. https://www.cihi.ca/en/virtual-care-in-canada .
    1. Ewart C, Baharani J, Wilkie M, Thomas N. Patient perspectives and experiences of remote consultations in people receiving kidney care: a scoping review. J Ren Care. 2022 Sep;48(3):143–153. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12419. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/35338610 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young A, Orchanian-Cheff A, Chan C, Wald R, Ong S. Video-based telemedicine for kidney disease care. CJASN. 2021 Dec;16(12):1813–1823. doi: 10.2215/cjn.06660521. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.06660521 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prasad G V Ramesh. Enhancing clinical judgement in virtual care for complex chronic disease. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;27(3):677–683. doi: 10.1111/jep.13544. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13544 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao B, Zhang L, Ji P, Lin J, Han J, Li J, Zhou Z, Wang Haiyun, Qiu L, Hong X, Williams W, Chen L. Bridging "office-based care" with the "virtual practice care model": evolving care for chronic kidney disease patients in the COVID-19 pandemic-and beyond. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020;7:568201. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.568201. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33240903 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources