Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Mar;134(3):693-702.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.012. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

Effect of a driving pressure-limiting strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to community-acquired pneumonia: the STAMINA randomised clinical trial

Israel Silva Maia  1 Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti  2 Lucas Tramujas  3 Viviane Cordeiro Veiga  4 Júlia Souza Oliveira  3 Erica Regina Ribeiro Sady  3 Letícia Galvão Barbante  3 Marina Lazzari Nicola  3 Rodrigo Magalhães Gurgel  3 Lucas Petri Damiani  3 Karina Leal Negrelli  3 Tamiris Abait Miranda  3 Ligia Nasi Laranjeira  3 Bruno Tomazzini  5 Cassio Zandonai  6 Mariangela Pimentel Pincelli  6 Glauco Adrieno Westphal  7 Ruthy Perotto Fernandes  8 Rodrigo Figueiredo  9 Cíntia Loss Sartori Bustamante  10 Luiz Fernando Norbin  11 Emerson Boschi  12 Rafael Lessa  12 Marcelo Pereira Romano  13 Mieko Cláudia Miura  13 Meton Soares de Alencar Filho  14 Vicente Cés de Souza Dantas  15 Priscilla Alves Barreto  15 Mauro Esteves Hernandes  16 Cintia Grion  17 Alexandre Sanches Laranjeira  18 Ana Luiza Mezzaroba  19 Marina Bahl  20 Ana Carolina Starke  20 Rodrigo Biondi  21 Felipe Dal-Pizzol  22 Eliana Caser  23 Marlus Muri Thompson  24 Andrea Allegrini Padial  25 Rodrigo Thot Leite  26 Gustavo Araújo  27 Mário Guimarães  28 Priscilla Aquino  29 Fábio Lacerda  30 Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Filho  31 Livia Melro  32 Eduardo Pacheco  33 Gustavo Ospina-Táscon  34 Juliana Carvalho Ferreira  35 Fabricio Jocundo Calado Freires  36 Flávia Ribeiro Machado  37 Fernando Godinho Zampieri  38 BRICNet
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a driving pressure-limiting strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to community-acquired pneumonia: the STAMINA randomised clinical trial

Israel Silva Maia et al. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy based on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration according to best respiratory system compliance and tidal volume adjustment increases the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods: This is a multi-centre, randomised trial, enrolling adults with moderate to severe ARDS secondary to community-acquired pneumonia. Patients were randomised to a driving pressure-limiting strategy or low PEEP strategy based on a PEEP:FiO2 table. All patients received volume assist-control mode until day 3 or when considered ready for spontaneous modes of ventilation. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days within 28 days. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality at 90 days.

Results: The trial was stopped because of recruitment fatigue after 214 patients were randomised. In total, 198 patients (n=96 intervention group, n=102 control group) were available for analysis (median age 63 yr, [interquartile range 47-73 yr]; 36% were women). The mean difference in driving pressure up to day 3 between the intervention and control groups was -0.7 cm H2O (95% confidence interval -1.4 to -0.1 cm H2O). Mean ventilator-free days were 6 (sd 9) in the driving pressure-limiting strategy group and 7 (9) in the control group (proportional odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.32; P=0.28). There were no significant differences regarding secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: In patients with moderate to severe ARDS secondary to community-acquired pneumonia, a driving pressure-limiting strategy did not increase the number of ventilator-free days compared with a standard low PEEP strategy within 28 days.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04972318.

Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; driving pressure; positive end-expiratory pressure; tidal volume; ventilator-induced lung injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Enrolment, randomisation, and follow-up of the study participants. The screening process, selection, and flow of patients through the trial are presented. Patients or next of kin were asked to provide consent after randomisation. The reason for the post-randomisation exclusions was the death of the participants before their next of kin could provide consent, combined with the lack of authorisation from the ethics committee to include data from these patients. Patients can have more than one reason for exclusion from the trial.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Primary outcome distribution. Data derived from the intention-to-treat population, consisting of all randomised patients with informed consent, are presented. A primary outcome is defined as ventilator-free days in 28 days. The figure illustrates a line graph mapping the cumulative frequency of ventilator-free days on the y-axis against the number of ventilator-free days on the x-axis, for two distinct groups. The intervention group is represented by a blue line, whereas the control group is depicted with an orange line. Each point along the lines corresponds to the cumulative frequency of patients achieving up to that number of ventilator-free days. Despite the visual trends suggested by the lines, statistical analysis indicates no significant differences between the two groups across the range of categories represented. The graph thus conveys the comparative outcomes of the intervention and control groups with respect to the duration of ventilator-free periods.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Ordinal primary outcome divided into 28 categories. The figure presents a categorical distribution of mechanical ventilation-free days among patients, depicted across 28 categories. The category representing zero ventilator-free days is highlighted in dark green, signifying the highest frequency within the dataset. Progressively, categories indicating a greater number of ventilator-free days are denoted with progressively more intense shades of orange.

References

    1. Bellani G., Laffey J.G., Pham T., et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315:788–800. - PubMed
    1. Cavalcanti A.B., Suzumura É.A., Laranjeira L.N., et al. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1335–1345. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L., Marini J.J., Pesenti A., Quintel M., Mancebo J., Brochard L. The “baby lung” became an adult. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:663–673. - PubMed
    1. Fan E., Brodie D., Slutsky A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2018;319:698–710. - PubMed
    1. Amato M.B., Meade M.O., Slutsky A.S., et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:747–755. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data