Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Second Reader on the Lung Nodule Detection and Localization Accuracy of Radiologists and Non-radiology Physicians in Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter Reader Study
- PMID: 39592384
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.003
Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Second Reader on the Lung Nodule Detection and Localization Accuracy of Radiologists and Non-radiology Physicians in Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter Reader Study
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Missed nodules in chest radiographs (CXRs) are common occurrences. We assessed the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) as a second reader on the accuracy of radiologists and non-radiology physicians in lung nodule detection and localization in CXRs.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study using the multi-reader multi-case design included 300 CXRs acquired from 40 hospitals across the US. All CXRs had a paired follow-up image (chest CT or CXR) to augment the ground truth establishment for the presence and location of nodules on CXRs by five independent thoracic radiologists. 15 readers (nine radiologists and six non-radiology physicians) read each CXR twice in a second-reader paradigm, once without AI and then immediately with AI assistance. The primary analysis assessed the difference in area-under-the-alternative-free-response-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AFROC) of readers with and without AI. Case-level area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity were assessed in secondary analyses.
Results: A total of 300 CXRs (147 with nodules, 153 without nodules) from 300 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 15 [standard deviation]; 174 women) were included. The mean AFROC of readers was 0.73 without AI and 0.81 with AI (95% CI of difference, 0.05-0.10). Case-level AUROC was 0.77 without AI and 0.84 with AI (95% CI of difference, 0.04-0.09). Case-level sensitivity was 72.8% and 83.5% (95% CI of difference, 6.8-14.6) and specificity was 71.1% and 72.0% (95% CI of difference, -0.8-2.6) without and with AI, respectively.
Conclusion: Using AI, readers detected and localized more nodules without any significant difference in false positive interpretations.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Chest X-ray; Computer-aided detection; Lung nodule; Missed nodule; Multi-reader multi-case study.
Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dennis Robert reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: employment. Saigopal Sathyamurthy reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: employment. Anshul Kumar Singh reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: employment. Sri Anusha Matta reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: employment. Manoj Tadepalli reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: employment. Swetha Tanamala reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: employment. Bunty Kundnani reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: employment. Vijay Bosemani reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: consulting or advisory. Joseph Mammarappallil reports a relationship with Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited that includes: consulting or advisory. Manoj Tadepalli has patent issued to Qure.ai Technologies Private Limited. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Retrospectively assessing evaluation and management of artificial-intelligence detected nodules on uninterpreted chest radiographs in the era of radiologists shortage.Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jan;170:111241. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111241. Epub 2023 Nov 28. Eur J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38042019
-
An Artificial Intelligence-Based Chest X-ray Model on Human Nodule Detection Accuracy From a Multicenter Study.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2141096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.41096. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34964851 Free PMC article.
-
AI-based improvement in lung cancer detection on chest radiographs: results of a multi-reader study in NLST dataset.Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9664-9674. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08074-7. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34089072
-
Artificial intelligence-supported lung cancer detection by multi-institutional readers with multi-vendor chest radiographs: a retrospective clinical validation study.BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08847-9. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34663260 Free PMC article.
-
Software with artificial intelligence-derived algorithms for detecting and analysing lung nodules in CT scans: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(14):1-234. doi: 10.3310/JYTW8921. Health Technol Assess. 2025. PMID: 40380885 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Innovative technologies and their clinical prospects for early lung cancer screening.Clin Exp Med. 2025 Jun 18;25(1):212. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01752-6. Clin Exp Med. 2025. PMID: 40533607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Radiology-Current Status and Critical Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(3):282. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15030282. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39941212 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-centered AI.Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 13;7:1638098. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1638098. eCollection 2025. Front Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40881731 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical